From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: mapping files for iommufd
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:05:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812150516.3e33c5c2.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <684a3618-ee15-4f85-ab44-3de0527f91fa@oracle.com>
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:56:03 -0400
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 8/12/2024 2:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 02:09:11PM -0400, Steven Sistare wrote:
> >> I have been using QEMU to test legacy vfio vs iommufd compatibility vfio.
> >> I find that backing guest memory with an ext4 file /root/guest.ram
> >> succeeds for legacy but fails for iommufd, with EFAULT in
> >> IOMMU_IOAS_MAP -> ... __get_user_pages -> check_vma_flags. Ditto for a
> >> hugetlbfs file. This is with unmodified kernels, no live update changes.
> >>
> >> Is this expected?
> >
> > Yes - I'm surprised that VFIO is not failing though?
> >
> > /*
> > * Writing to file-backed mappings which require folio dirty tracking using GUP
> > * is a fundamentally broken operation, as kernel write access to GUP mappings
> > * do not adhere to the semantics expected by a file system.
> > *
> > * Consider the following scenario:-
> > *
> > * 1. A folio is written to via GUP which write-faults the memory, notifying
> > * the file system and dirtying the folio.
> > * 2. Later, writeback is triggered, resulting in the folio being cleaned and
> > * the PTE being marked read-only.
> > * 3. The GUP caller writes to the folio, as it is mapped read/write via the
> > * direct mapping.
> > * 4. The GUP caller, now done with the page, unpins it and sets it dirty
> > * (though it does not have to).
> > *
> > * This results in both data being written to a folio without writenotify, and
> > * the folio being dirtied unexpectedly (if the caller decides to do so).
> > */
> > static bool writable_file_mapping_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long gup_flags)
> > {
> >
> > Why doesn't that fail in the VFIO case? I didn't notice anything
> > special there that would make it work???
>
> vfio_dma_do_map -> vfio_pin_map_dma -> vfio_pin_pages_remote does not call GUP,
> it just grabs a reference to each page.
Can you be more specific, because...
vfio_pin_pages_remote
vaddr_get_pfns
pin_user_pages_remote
__gup_longterm_locked
__get_user_pages_locked
__get_user_pages
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 18:09 mapping files for iommufd Steven Sistare
2024-08-12 18:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-12 18:56 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-12 21:05 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2024-08-13 14:23 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-13 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-13 15:13 ` Steven Sistare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240812150516.3e33c5c2.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox