Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/amd: Reorder attach device code
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:58:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910065812.6091-10-vasant.hegde@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910065812.6091-1-vasant.hegde@amd.com>

Previous patch converted dev_data lock to mutex. Move PCI device capability
enablement (ATS, PRI, PASID) and IOPF enablement code inside the lock. Also
in attach_device(), update 'dev_data->domain' at the end so that error
handling becomes simple.

Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
index 0f83e1b3fb0c..e7fc59e30387 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
@@ -2086,6 +2086,7 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct amd_iommu *iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
+	struct pci_dev *pdev;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_data->mutex);
@@ -2095,10 +2096,6 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/* Update data structures */
-	dev_data->domain = domain;
-	list_add(&dev_data->list, &domain->dev_list);
-
 	/* Do reference counting */
 	ret = pdom_attach_iommu(iommu, domain);
 	if (ret)
@@ -2113,6 +2110,28 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
 		}
 	}
 
+	pdev = dev_is_pci(dev_data->dev) ? to_pci_dev(dev_data->dev) : NULL;
+	if (pdev && pdom_is_sva_capable(domain)) {
+		pdev_enable_caps(pdev);
+
+		/*
+		 * Device can continue to function even if IOPF
+		 * enablement failed. Hence in error path just
+		 * disable device PRI support.
+		 */
+		if (amd_iommu_iopf_add_device(iommu, dev_data))
+			pdev_disable_cap_pri(pdev);
+	} else if (pdev) {
+		pdev_enable_cap_ats(pdev);
+	}
+
+	/* Update data structures */
+	dev_data->domain = domain;
+	list_add(&dev_data->list, &domain->dev_list);
+
+	/* Update device table */
+	dev_update_dte(dev_data, true);
+
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_data->mutex);
 
@@ -2127,7 +2146,6 @@ static void detach_device(struct device *dev)
 	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct amd_iommu *iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
 	struct protection_domain *domain = dev_data->domain;
-	bool ppr = dev_data->ppr;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_data->mutex);
 
@@ -2140,13 +2158,15 @@ static void detach_device(struct device *dev)
 	if (WARN_ON(!dev_data->domain))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (ppr) {
+	/* Remove IOPF handler */
+	if (dev_data->ppr) {
 		iopf_queue_flush_dev(dev);
-
-		/* Updated here so that it gets reflected in DTE */
-		dev_data->ppr = false;
+		amd_iommu_iopf_remove_device(iommu, dev_data);
 	}
 
+	if (dev_is_pci(dev))
+		pdev_disable_caps(to_pci_dev(dev));
+
 	/* Clear DTE and flush the entry */
 	dev_update_dte(dev_data, false);
 
@@ -2166,14 +2186,6 @@ static void detach_device(struct device *dev)
 
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_data->mutex);
-
-	/* Remove IOPF handler */
-	if (ppr)
-		amd_iommu_iopf_remove_device(iommu, dev_data);
-
-	if (dev_is_pci(dev))
-		pdev_disable_caps(to_pci_dev(dev));
-
 }
 
 static struct iommu_device *amd_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
@@ -2450,7 +2462,6 @@ static int amd_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *dom,
 	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct protection_domain *domain = to_pdomain(dom);
 	struct amd_iommu *iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev(dev);
-	struct pci_dev *pdev;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -2483,24 +2494,6 @@ static int amd_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *dom,
 	}
 #endif
 
-	pdev = dev_is_pci(dev_data->dev) ? to_pci_dev(dev_data->dev) : NULL;
-	if (pdev && pdom_is_sva_capable(domain)) {
-		pdev_enable_caps(pdev);
-
-		/*
-		 * Device can continue to function even if IOPF
-		 * enablement failed. Hence in error path just
-		 * disable device PRI support.
-		 */
-		if (amd_iommu_iopf_add_device(iommu, dev_data))
-			pdev_disable_cap_pri(pdev);
-	} else if (pdev) {
-		pdev_enable_cap_ats(pdev);
-	}
-
-	/* Update device table */
-	dev_update_dte(dev_data, true);
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-10  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-10  6:58 [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/amd: Improve domain allocator and device attach code path Vasant Hegde
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/amd: Use ida interface to manage protection domain ID Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:38   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/amd: Remove protection_domain.dev_cnt variable Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:39   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/amd: xarray to track protection_domain->iommu list Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:39   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/amd: Remove unused amd_iommus variable Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:39   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/amd: Do not detach devices in domain free path Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:40   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/amd: Reduce domain lock scope in attach device path Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:38   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-10-15 12:30     ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 16:12       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-15 16:45         ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 17:01           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-16 10:13             ` Vasant Hegde
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/amd: Rearrange attach device code Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:41   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/amd: Convert dev_data lock from spinlock to mutex Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:43   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10  6:58 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2024-10-15  8:44   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/amd: Reorder attach device code Joerg Roedel
2024-10-15 16:42     ` Vasant Hegde
2024-09-10  6:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/amd: Improve amd_iommu_release_device() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15  8:45   ` Joerg Roedel
2024-10-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/amd: Improve domain allocator and device attach code path Vasant Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240910065812.6091-10-vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox