From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/amd: Reduce domain lock scope in attach device path
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:58:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910065812.6091-7-vasant.hegde@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910065812.6091-1-vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Protection domain lock is required only when updating domain details.
Hence reduce the scope of protection domain lock.
Also move numa node assignment to pdom_attach_iommu().
Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
---
drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
index a4a4fc7ba689..713d05a85de9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
@@ -2016,16 +2016,23 @@ static int pdom_attach_iommu(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
struct protection_domain *pdom)
{
struct pdom_iommu_info *pdom_iommu_info, *curr;
+ struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg = &pdom->iop.pgtbl.cfg;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pdom->lock, flags);
pdom_iommu_info = xa_load(&pdom->iommu_array, iommu->index);
if (pdom_iommu_info) {
pdom_iommu_info->refcnt++;
- return 0;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
pdom_iommu_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdom_iommu_info), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!pdom_iommu_info)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!pdom_iommu_info) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
pdom_iommu_info->iommu = iommu;
pdom_iommu_info->refcnt = 1;
@@ -2034,43 +2041,52 @@ static int pdom_attach_iommu(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
NULL, pdom_iommu_info, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (curr) {
kfree(pdom_iommu_info);
- return -ENOSPC;
+ ret = -ENOSPC;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
- return 0;
+ /* Update NUMA Node ID */
+ if (cfg->amd.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ cfg->amd.nid = dev_to_node(&iommu->dev->dev);
+
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdom->lock, flags);
+ return ret;
}
static void pdom_detach_iommu(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
struct protection_domain *pdom)
{
struct pdom_iommu_info *pdom_iommu_info;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pdom->lock, flags);
pdom_iommu_info = xa_load(&pdom->iommu_array, iommu->index);
- if (!pdom_iommu_info)
+ if (!pdom_iommu_info) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdom->lock, flags);
return;
+ }
pdom_iommu_info->refcnt--;
if (pdom_iommu_info->refcnt == 0) {
xa_erase(&pdom->iommu_array, iommu->index);
kfree(pdom_iommu_info);
}
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdom->lock, flags);
}
static int do_attach(struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
struct protection_domain *domain)
{
struct amd_iommu *iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
- struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg = &domain->iop.pgtbl.cfg;
int ret = 0;
/* Update data structures */
dev_data->domain = domain;
list_add(&dev_data->list, &domain->dev_list);
- /* Update NUMA Node ID */
- if (cfg->amd.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- cfg->amd.nid = dev_to_node(dev_data->dev);
-
/* Do reference counting */
ret = pdom_attach_iommu(iommu, domain);
if (ret)
@@ -2119,11 +2135,8 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
struct protection_domain *domain)
{
struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data;
- unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
-
dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
spin_lock(&dev_data->lock);
@@ -2138,8 +2151,6 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
out:
spin_unlock(&dev_data->lock);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
-
return ret;
}
@@ -2149,13 +2160,9 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
static void detach_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
- struct protection_domain *domain = dev_data->domain;
struct amd_iommu *iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
- unsigned long flags;
bool ppr = dev_data->ppr;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
-
spin_lock(&dev_data->lock);
/*
@@ -2179,8 +2186,6 @@ static void detach_device(struct device *dev)
out:
spin_unlock(&dev_data->lock);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
-
/* Remove IOPF handler */
if (ppr)
amd_iommu_iopf_remove_device(iommu, dev_data);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 6:58 [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/amd: Improve domain allocator and device attach code path Vasant Hegde
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/amd: Use ida interface to manage protection domain ID Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/amd: Remove protection_domain.dev_cnt variable Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/amd: xarray to track protection_domain->iommu list Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/amd: Remove unused amd_iommus variable Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/amd: Do not detach devices in domain free path Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2024-10-15 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/amd: Reduce domain lock scope in attach device path Joerg Roedel
2024-10-15 12:30 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 16:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-15 16:45 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 17:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-16 10:13 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/amd: Rearrange attach device code Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/amd: Convert dev_data lock from spinlock to mutex Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/amd: Reorder attach device code Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:44 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-10-15 16:42 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-09-10 6:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/amd: Improve amd_iommu_release_device() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-15 8:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-10-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/amd: Improve domain allocator and device attach code path Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240910065812.6091-7-vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox