From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"aneesh.kumar@kernel.org" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"aik@amd.com" <aik@amd.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:40:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702124042.GD1051729@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52769790C63FFCDC711E80DB8C40A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 09:13:50AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > Yes, you can't touch idev inside the destroy function at all, under
> > > any version. idev is only valid if you have a refcount on vdev.
> > >
> > > But why are you touching this lock? Arrange things so abort doesn't
> > > touch the idev??
> >
> > idev has a pointer idev->vdev to track the vdev's lifecycle.
> > idev->igroup->lock protects the pointer. At the end of
> > iommufd_vdevice_destroy() this pointer should be NULLed so that idev
> > knows vdev is really destroyed.
Well, that is destroy, not abort, but OK, there is an issue with
destroy.
> but comparing to that I'd prefer to the original wait approach...
Okay, but lets try to keep the wait hidden inside the refcounting..
The issue here is we don't hold a refcount on idev while working with
idev. Let's fix that and then things should work properly?
Maybe something like this:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
index 4e781aa9fc6329..9174fa7c972b80 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -178,12 +178,20 @@ static void iommufd_device_remove_vdev(struct iommufd_device *idev)
mutex_unlock(&idev->igroup->lock);
}
+void iommufd_device_pre_destroy(struct iommufd_object *obj)
+{
+ struct iommufd_device *idev =
+ container_of(obj, struct iommufd_device, obj);
+
+ /* Release the short term users on this */
+ iommufd_device_remove_vdev(idev);
+}
+
void iommufd_device_destroy(struct iommufd_object *obj)
{
struct iommufd_device *idev =
container_of(obj, struct iommufd_device, obj);
- iommufd_device_remove_vdev(idev);
iommu_device_release_dma_owner(idev->dev);
iommufd_put_group(idev->igroup);
if (!iommufd_selftest_is_mock_dev(idev->dev))
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
index b2e8e106c16158..387c630fdabfbd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
@@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ static int iommufd_object_dec_wait_shortterm(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&to_destroy->shortterm_users))
return 0;
+ if (iommufd_object_ops[to_destroy->type].pre_destroy)
+ iommufd_object_ops[to_destroy->type].pre_destroy(to_destroy);
+
if (wait_event_timeout(ictx->destroy_wait,
refcount_read(&to_destroy->shortterm_users) == 0,
msecs_to_jiffies(60000)))
@@ -567,6 +570,7 @@ static const struct iommufd_object_ops iommufd_object_ops[] = {
.destroy = iommufd_access_destroy_object,
},
[IOMMUFD_OBJ_DEVICE] = {
+ .pre_destroy = iommufd_device_pre_destroy,
.destroy = iommufd_device_destroy,
},
[IOMMUFD_OBJ_FAULT] = {
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/viommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/viommu.c
index 9451a311745f7b..cbf99daa7dc25d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/viommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/viommu.c
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ void iommufd_vdevice_destroy(struct iommufd_object *obj)
mutex_lock(&vdev->idev->igroup->lock);
iommufd_vdevice_abort(obj);
mutex_unlock(&vdev->idev->igroup->lock);
+ iommufd_put_object(vdev->viommu->ictx, &vdev->idev->obj);
}
int iommufd_vdevice_alloc_ioctl(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
@@ -180,13 +181,19 @@ int iommufd_vdevice_alloc_ioctl(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
vdev->id = virt_id;
vdev->viommu = viommu;
refcount_inc(&viommu->obj.users);
+
+ /*
+ * A reference is held on the idev so long as we have a pointer.
+ * iommufd_device_pre_destroy() will revoke it before the real
+ * destruction.
+ */
+ vdev->idev = idev;
+
/*
* iommufd_device_destroy() waits until idev->vdev is NULL before
* freeing the idev, which only happens once the vdev is finished
- * destruction. Thus we do not need refcounting on either idev->vdev or
- * vdev->idev.
+ * destruction.
*/
- vdev->idev = idev;
idev->vdev = vdev;
curr = xa_cmpxchg(&viommu->vdevs, virt_id, NULL, vdev, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -207,7 +214,8 @@ int iommufd_vdevice_alloc_ioctl(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
out_unlock_igroup:
mutex_unlock(&idev->igroup->lock);
out_put_idev:
- iommufd_put_object(ucmd->ictx, &idev->obj);
+ if (rc)
+ iommufd_put_object(ucmd->ictx, &idev->obj);
out_put_viommu:
iommufd_put_object(ucmd->ictx, &viommu->obj);
return rc;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 3:38 [PATCH v3 0/5] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-06-27 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 3:08 ` Baolu Lu
2025-06-30 7:24 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 5:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-30 6:41 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 19:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-08 8:45 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-27 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 5:08 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-08 8:34 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 6:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-30 10:18 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 14:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-01 9:19 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-01 12:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-02 2:23 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-02 9:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-02 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-03 4:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-03 11:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-07 10:58 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-07 12:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-07 19:41 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 19:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-08 8:12 ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-27 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 5:11 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-04 15:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-04 15:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702124042.GD1051729@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox