Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	jgg@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, aik@amd.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	yilun.xu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:08:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b531ec51-625b-4ea0-a0e1-a90c02cb5e8a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250627033809.1730752-2-yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>

On 6/27/25 11:38, Xu Yilun wrote:
> Add the iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper, which allows the caller
> to destroy an iommufd object created by userspace.
> 
> This is useful on some destroy paths when the kernel caller finds the
> object should have been removed by userspace but is still alive. With
> this helper, the caller destroys the object but leave the object ID
> reserved (so called tombstone). The tombstone prevents repurposing the
> object ID without awareness of the original user.
> 
> Since this happens for abnomal userspace behavior, for simplicity, the
> tombstoned object ID would be permanently leaked until
> iommufd_fops_release(). I.e. the original user gets an error when
> calling ioctl(IOMMU_DESTROY) on that ID.
> 
> The first use case would be to ensure the iommufd_vdevice can't outlive
> the associated iommufd_device.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@nvidia.com>
> Co-developed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)<aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)<aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun<yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c            | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> index 9ccc83341f32..fbc9ef78d81f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> @@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ void iommufd_object_finalize(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>   			     struct iommufd_object *obj);
>   
>   enum {
> -	REMOVE_WAIT_SHORTTERM = 1,
> +	REMOVE_WAIT_SHORTTERM	= BIT(0),
> +	REMOVE_OBJ_TOMBSTONE	= BIT(1),
>   };
>   int iommufd_object_remove(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>   			  struct iommufd_object *to_destroy, u32 id,
> @@ -213,6 +214,26 @@ static inline void iommufd_object_destroy_user(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>   	WARN_ON(ret);
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Similar to iommufd_object_destroy_user(), except that the object ID is left
> + * reserved/tombstoned.
> + */
> +static inline void iommufd_object_tombstone_user(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
> +						 struct iommufd_object *obj)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = iommufd_object_remove(ictx, obj, obj->id,
> +				    REMOVE_WAIT_SHORTTERM | REMOVE_OBJ_TOMBSTONE);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If there is a bug and we couldn't destroy the object then we did put
> +	 * back the caller's users refcount and will eventually try to free it
> +	 * again during close.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON(ret);
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * The HWPT allocated by autodomains is used in possibly many devices and
>    * is automatically destroyed when its refcount reaches zero.
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
> index 3df468f64e7d..620923669b42 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int iommufd_object_remove(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>   		goto err_xa;
>   	}
>   
> -	xas_store(&xas, NULL);
> +	xas_store(&xas, (flags & REMOVE_OBJ_TOMBSTONE) ? XA_ZERO_ENTRY : NULL);
>   	if (ictx->vfio_ioas == container_of(obj, struct iommufd_ioas, obj))
>   		ictx->vfio_ioas = NULL;
>   	xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static int iommufd_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   	struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *next;
>   	struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *cur;
>   	struct iommufd_object *obj;
> +	bool empty;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * The objects in the xarray form a graph of "users" counts, and we have
> @@ -249,23 +250,35 @@ static int iommufd_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>   	 * until the entire list is destroyed. If this can't progress then there
>   	 * is some bug related to object refcounting.
>   	 */
> -	while (!xa_empty(&ictx->objects)) {
> +	for (;;) {
>   		unsigned int destroyed = 0;
>   		unsigned long index;
>   
> +		empty = true;
>   		xa_for_each(&ictx->objects, index, obj) {
> +			empty = false;

People like me, who don't know the details of how xa_for_each() and
xa_empty() work, will ask why "empty = xa_empty()" isn't used here. So
it's better to add some comments to make it more readable.

/* XA_ZERO_ENTRY is treated as a null entry by xa_for_each(). */

Others look good to me.

Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

>   			if (!refcount_dec_if_one(&obj->users))
>   				continue;
> +
>   			destroyed++;
>   			xa_erase(&ictx->objects, index);
>   			iommufd_object_ops[obj->type].destroy(obj);
>   			kfree(obj);
>   		}
> +
> +		if (empty)
> +			break;
> +
>   		/* Bug related to users refcount */
>   		if (WARN_ON(!destroyed))
>   			break;
>   	}

Thanks,
baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-30  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-27  3:38 [PATCH v3 0/5] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-06-27  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-06-30  3:08   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-06-30  7:24     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30  5:52   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-30  6:41     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 19:50   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-08  8:45     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-27  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-06-30  5:08   ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-08  8:34     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30  6:27   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-30 10:18     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 14:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-01  9:19         ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-01 12:13           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-02  2:23             ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-02  9:13               ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-02 12:40                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-03  4:32                   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-03 11:21                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-07 10:58                   ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-07 12:25                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-07 19:41                       ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-30 19:34   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-08  8:12     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-27  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-06-30  5:11   ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-04 15:06   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-04 15:07   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27  3:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b531ec51-625b-4ea0-a0e1-a90c02cb5e8a@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox