From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Marc Zygnier <maz@kernel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ntb@googlegroups.com" <linux-ntb@googlegroups.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 23:09:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735n1zaz3.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211209205835.GZ6385@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Dec 09 2021 at 16:58, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> That was my thought to avoid having different mechanisms.
>>
>> The address/data pair is computed in two places:
>>
>> 1) Activation of an interrupt
>> 2) Affinity setting on an interrupt
>>
>> Both configure the IRTE when interrupt remapping is in place.
>>
>> In both cases a vector is allocated in the vector domain and based on
>> the resulting target APIC / vector number pair the IRTE is
>> (re)configured.
>>
>> So putting the hypercall into the vIRTE update is the obvious
>> place. Both activation and affinity setting can fail and propagate an
>> error code down to the originating caller.
>>
>> Hmm?
>
> Okay, I think I get it. Would be nice to have someone from intel
> familiar with the vIOMMU protocols and qemu code remark what the
> hypervisor side can look like.
>
> There is a bit more work here, we'd have to change VFIO to somehow
> entirely disconnect the kernel IRQ logic from the MSI table and
> directly pass control of it to the guest after the hypervisor IOMMU IR
> secures it. ie directly mmap the msi-x table into the guest
That makes everything consistent and a clear cut on all levels, right?
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211126230957.239391799@linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20211126232735.547996838@linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <7daba0e2-73a3-4980-c3a5-a71f6b597b22@deltatee.com>
[not found] ` <874k7ueldt.ffs@tglx>
[not found] ` <6ba084d6-2b26-7c86-4526-8fcd3d921dfd@deltatee.com>
[not found] ` <87ilwacwp8.ffs@tglx>
[not found] ` <d6f13729-1b83-fa7d-3f0d-98d4e3f7a2aa@deltatee.com>
[not found] ` <87v909bf2k.ffs@tglx>
[not found] ` <20211130202800.GE4670@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <87o861banv.ffs@tglx>
[not found] ` <20211201001748.GF4670@nvidia.com>
2021-12-01 10:16 ` [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc() Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-01 13:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-01 17:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-01 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-01 18:46 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2021-12-01 20:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-02 0:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-02 13:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-02 14:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-02 14:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-02 19:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-02 20:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-02 22:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-03 0:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-03 15:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-03 16:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-04 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-05 14:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-06 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-06 15:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-06 17:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-06 20:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-06 21:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-06 22:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-06 14:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-06 15:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-09 6:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-09 9:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-09 12:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-09 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-10 7:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-09 5:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-09 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-01 16:28 ` Dave Jiang
2021-12-01 18:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-01 18:47 ` Dave Jiang
2021-12-01 20:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-01 21:21 ` Dave Jiang
2021-12-01 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-01 21:49 ` Dave Jiang
2021-12-01 22:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-01 22:53 ` Dave Jiang
2021-12-01 23:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-09 5:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-09 8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-09 12:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-09 16:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-09 20:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-09 20:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-09 22:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-12-10 0:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-10 7:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-10 12:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-11 8:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-10 12:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-10 19:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-11 7:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-11 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-12 1:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-12 20:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-12 23:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-13 7:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-11 7:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-12 0:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-12 2:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-12 20:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-12 23:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-10 7:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-12-10 12:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-12-12 6:44 ` Mika Penttilä
2021-12-12 23:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8735n1zaz3.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=megha.dey@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox