From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc] iommu/sva: Restore SVA handle sharing
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:06:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6dd12c0-4d2c-432e-96c6-10a24e4b16b1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v1-9455fc497a6f+3b4-iommu_sva_sharing_jgg@nvidia.com>
On 2024/2/22 22:07, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Prior to commit 092edaddb660 ("iommu: Support mm PASID 1:n with sva
> domains") the code allowed a SVA handle to be bound multiple times to the
> same (mm, device) pair. This was alluded to in the kdoc comment, but we
> had understood this to be more a remark about allowing multiple devices,
> not a literal same-driver re-opening the same SVA.
>
> It turns out uacce and idxd were both relying on the core code to handle
> reference counting for same-device same-mm scenarios. As this looks hard
> to resolve in the drivers bring it back to the core code.
>
> The new design has changed the meaning of the domain->users refcount to
> refer to the number of devices that are sharing that domain for the same
> mm. This is part of the design to lift the SVA domain de-duplication out
> of the drivers.
>
> Return the old behavior by explicitly de-duplicating the struct iommu_sva
> handle. The same (mm, device) will return the same handle pointer and the
> core code will handle tracking this. The last unbind of the handle will
> destroy it.
>
> Fixes: 092edaddb660 ("iommu: Support mm PASID 1:n with sva domains")
> Reported-by: Zhangfei Gao<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> Closes:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221110658.529-1-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org/
> Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 14:07 [PATCH rc] iommu/sva: Restore SVA handle sharing Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-22 14:39 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-02-23 5:06 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-02-23 15:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-02-26 8:38 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-02-26 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6dd12c0-4d2c-432e-96c6-10a24e4b16b1@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox