From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 10:45:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231006174550.GC3359308@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f50c8ea0e63615aea28fe7f6049703e1d28ba7eb.1696595500.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 03:34:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> We enable a bunch more compiler warnings than the kernel
> defaults. However, they've drifted to become a unique set of warnings,
> and have increasingly fallen behind from the W=1 set.
>
> Align with the W=1 warnings from scripts/Makefile.extrawarn for clarity,
> by copy-pasting them with s/KBUILD_CFLAGS/subdir-ccflags-y/ to make it
> easier to compare in the future.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
One meta comment and review comment below. Feel free to carry forward
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
on future revisions.
> ---
>
> An alternative or future option would be to have Makefile.extrawarn
> assign W=1 etc. flags to intermediate variables, say KBUILD_CFLAGS_W1,
> like this:
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS_W1 += -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter
> etc...
>
> export KBUILD_CFLAGS_W1
>
> ifneq ($(findstring 1, $(KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN)),)
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(KBUILD_CFLAGS_W1)
>
> else
> etc...
>
> and then drivers and subsystems could simply use:
>
> subdir-ccflags-y += $(KBUILD_CFLAGS_W1)
>
> to enable and remain up-to-date with W=1 warnings.
This has definitely come up a few times and while I am generally in
favor of something like this, it makes adding warnings to W=1 a little
bit harder because when we add warnings to W=1, we typically are not
concerned with breaking the build, as W=1 is not the default build. If a
subsystem has opted into "whatever the current W=1 is" by default,
changes to W=1 will have to be reviewed/tested within a normal build.
Doing something like this patch with a more regular cadence (maybe every
update after the merge window) seems like a reasonable compromise to me,
although I know that means more work for individual subsystem
maintainers.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index 623f81217442..0485157054fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -3,22 +3,25 @@
> # Makefile for the drm device driver. This driver provides support for the
> # Direct Rendering Infrastructure (DRI) in XFree86 4.1.0 and higher.
>
> -# Add a set of useful warning flags and enable -Werror for CI to prevent
> -# trivial mistakes from creeping in. We have to do this piecemeal as we reject
> -# any patch that isn't warning clean, so turning on -Wextra (or W=1) we
> -# need to filter out dubious warnings. Still it is our interest
> -# to keep running locally with W=1 C=1 until we are completely clean.
> -#
> -# Note the danger in using -Wextra is that when CI updates gcc we
> -# will most likely get a sudden build breakage... Hopefully we will fix
> -# new warnings before CI updates!
> -subdir-ccflags-y := -Wextra
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-unused-parameter
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-type-limits
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-shift-negative-value
As the test robot points out, you'll want to keep these four, as they
are only enabled for W=2 or W=3. With this diff on top of these two
patches:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
index 0485157054fc..9c4e09c8aa4e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-overflow)
subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-truncation)
# --- end copy-paste
+# The following turn off the warnings enabled by -Wextra
+subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-type-limits
+subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
+subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare
+subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-shift-negative-value
+
# Enable -Werror in CI and development
subdir-ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR) += -Werror
I can continue to build i915 warning free with ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
using all supported versions of LLVM for building the kernel.
> +# Unconditionally enable W=1 warnings locally
> +# --- begin copy-paste W=1 warnings from scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-declarations
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wrestrict)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-format-attribute
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-prototypes
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wold-style-definition
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-include-dirs
> subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wunused-but-set-variable)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wunused-const-variable)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wpacked-not-aligned)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wformat-overflow)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wformat-truncation)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-overflow)
> +subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wstringop-truncation)
> +# --- end copy-paste
> +
> +# Enable -Werror in CI and development
> subdir-ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR) += -Werror
>
> # Fine grained warnings disable
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-06 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 12:34 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: align with W=1 warnings Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: drop -Wall and related disables from cflags as redundant Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 17:02 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-06 21:12 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-10-07 15:28 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-10-09 16:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-10 8:29 ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-10 8:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-10-10 15:46 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-10-11 7:31 ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 12:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default Jani Nikula
2023-10-06 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2023-10-06 17:45 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-10-10 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231006174550.GC3359308@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox