From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: Add 'make kvmconfig'
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:24:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB10C3D.6090906@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111102091747.GH18903@elte.hu>
On 2.11.2011 10:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On 2.11.2011 09:41, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Yeah. Note that it's more like an 'add' operation, not a modify
>>> operation, thus:
>>>
>>> make addconfig=kvm
>>>
>>> or:
>>>
>>> make addconfig kvm
>>>
>>> would be intuitive and would work well too.
>>>
>>> Sam, Michal, which one would you prefer? The latter might have the
>>> advantage that it's additive, enabling future usages like:
>>>
>>> make addconfig kvm debug
>>
>> The problem is that neither of these fit into the make command syntax:
>>
>> make addconfig kvm debug
>>
>> tells make to build three different targets, and
>>
>> make addconfig=kvm
>>
>> tells make to create a variable named addconfig with the value kvm
>> and build the default target. And BTW, you or someone else
>> reassured me earlier in the thread that this is going to be needed
>> for the kvm case solely, so why are you inventing something generic
>> now? :)
>
> Because we are trying to find *something* that is both usable and
> which you guys are willing to ack.
>
> So what's your suggestion? Is 'make kvmconfig' OK?
As I said, make kvmconfig is fine with me, if it's just this single case.
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-27 12:07 [PATCH] config: Add 'make kvmconfig' Sasha Levin
2011-10-27 12:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-27 12:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 12:51 ` Michal Marek
2011-10-27 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 14:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-27 14:32 ` Michal Marek
2011-10-27 15:05 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-10-27 15:19 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-10-27 15:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-27 18:05 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-10-27 20:46 ` Sasha Levin
2011-10-27 19:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-10-28 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-28 7:23 ` Sasha Levin
2011-10-28 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-28 7:47 ` Sasha Levin
2011-10-28 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-28 7:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-28 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-28 12:08 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2011-10-28 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-28 13:05 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2011-11-02 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-02 9:07 ` Michal Marek
2011-11-02 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-02 9:24 ` Michal Marek [this message]
2011-11-02 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-02 10:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-28 9:16 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB10C3D.6090906@suse.cz \
--to=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ms@citd.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox