Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [Cocci] [v2 05/26] parsing_cocci: visitor_ast: Add cases for ParenType/FunctionType

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [Cocci] [v2 05/26] parsing_cocci: visitor_ast: Add cases for ParenType/FunctionType

[Markus Elfring]

> Changes in v2:
> …
> - Change the "visitor_ast0" in patch subject to "visitor_ast"

Thanks for such a software update.

I suggest to reconsider the patch granularity once more.
Would you like to reduce the possibilities for confusion around
the presented software transformation?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [Cocci] [v2 05/26] parsing_cocci: visitor_ast: Add cases for ParenType/FunctionType

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:34:08AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Changes in v2:
> > …
> > - Change the "visitor_ast0" in patch subject to "visitor_ast"
> 
> Thanks for such a software update.
> 
> I suggest to reconsider the patch granularity once more.
> Would you like to reduce the possibilities for confusion around
> the presented software transformation?

One of the hardest things in dealing with a community is to learn who to
ignore when it comes to patch reviews and comments.  Just a friendly
reminder that this person is on many upstream kernel developer's
email-block lists due to the ability to cause huge time-sinks for no
valid reason.

I suggest that others do the same as well.

thanks!

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [Cocci] [v2 05/26] parsing_cocci: visitor_ast: Add cases for ParenType/FunctionType

[Markus Elfring]

> One of the hardest things in dealing with a community is to learn who to
> ignore when it comes to patch reviews and comments.

I suggest to reconsider also this information once more.


> Just a friendly reminder that this person is on many upstream kernel developer's
> email-block lists due to the ability to cause huge time-sinks

Some clarification attempts will trigger the usual efforts.
I hope that our communication difficulties can become more constructive
often enough.


> for no valid reason.

Please take another look at the published software development statistics.

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees