From: Luis Felipe Hernandez <luis.hernandez093@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
brendan.higgins@linux.dev, davidgow@google.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
ricardo@marliere.net,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/math: Add int_sqrt test suite
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 17:01:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyVBqEgX-z3flsDT@x13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241031173941.3487ccbfd7421d81d9b0cb97@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 05:39:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > --- a/lib/math/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/math/Makefile
> > > @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INT_POW_TEST) += tests/int_pow_kunit.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_DIV64) += test_div64.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MULDIV64) += test_mul_u64_u64_div_u64.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_RATIONAL_KUNIT_TEST) += rational-test.o
> > > +obj-y += tests/
>
> What's this change about? It seems somewhat unrelated to adding a
> single test. I mean, there's an unrelated test listed in
> lib/math/tests/Makefile so what change does this patch have upon that
> one?
>
Hello Andrew, I apologize about the late response. I made this change in
order to try and stay aligned with this previous patch moving all
lib/math/ kunit tests into lib/math/tests/: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241005222446.10471-1-luis.hernandez093@gmail.com/
From my understanding, kbuild wouldn't pick up the entry if it
was just specified in lib/math/tests/Makefile without a reference to it in
it's parent lib/math/Makefile. I didn't want to this
patch to end up in a situation where it would introduce an explicit
object entry in lib/math/Makefile pointing to
obj-$(CONFIG_INT_SQRT_KUNIT_TEST) += tests/int_sqrt_kunit.o
as is the case in mainline at the moment: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/math/Makefile?h=v6.12-rc5#n8
This would in a sense introduce a regression in the organization of
the Makefile in lib/math/.
I apologize for not adding the reasoning behind the change in the
original patch.
Best,
Felipe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 13:43 [PATCH v3] lib/math: Add int_sqrt test suite Luis Felipe Hernandez
2024-10-31 17:50 ` Shuah Khan
2024-11-01 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-01 2:25 ` Shuah Khan
2024-11-01 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-01 4:27 ` Andrew Morton
2024-11-01 21:01 ` Luis Felipe Hernandez [this message]
2024-11-11 3:39 ` Luis Felipe Hernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyVBqEgX-z3flsDT@x13 \
--to=luis.hernandez093@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo@marliere.net \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox