[PATCH net-next 2/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use extack in mlxsw_sp~_rif_ipip_lb_configure()

[Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>]

In commit 26029225d992 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Propagate extack
further"), the mlxsw_sp_rif_ops.configure callback got a new argument,
extack. However the callbacks that deal with tunnel configuration,
mlxsw_sp1_rif_ipip_lb_configure() and mlxsw_sp2_rif_ipip_lb_configure(),
were never updated to pass the parameter further. Do that now.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index c905c8f153b4..20ece1b49175 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -9724,7 +9724,7 @@ mlxsw_sp1_rif_ipip_lb_configure(struct mlxsw_sp_rif *rif,
 	struct mlxsw_sp_vr *ul_vr;
 	int err;
 
-	ul_vr = mlxsw_sp_vr_get(mlxsw_sp, ul_tb_id, NULL);
+	ul_vr = mlxsw_sp_vr_get(mlxsw_sp, ul_tb_id, extack);
 	if (IS_ERR(ul_vr))
 		return PTR_ERR(ul_vr);
 
@@ -9923,7 +9923,7 @@ mlxsw_sp2_rif_ipip_lb_configure(struct mlxsw_sp_rif *rif,
 	struct mlxsw_sp_rif *ul_rif;
 	int err;
 
-	ul_rif = mlxsw_sp_ul_rif_get(mlxsw_sp, ul_tb_id, NULL);
+	ul_rif = mlxsw_sp_ul_rif_get(mlxsw_sp, ul_tb_id, extack);
 	if (IS_ERR(ul_rif))
 		return PTR_ERR(ul_rif);
 
-- 
2.40.1