From: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
"Amit Cohen" <amcohen@nvidia.com>,
Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <mlxsw@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Do not query MAX_VRS on each iteration
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:20:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e14a05ab55f8fce70ad4c6821a83f910f9b6a88.1685720841.git.petrm@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1685720841.git.petrm@nvidia.com>
MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET involves a call to spectrum_core, a separate module.
Instead of making the call on every iteration, cache it up front, and use
the value.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index f88b0197a6ac..7304e8a29cf9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -748,10 +748,11 @@ static bool mlxsw_sp_vr_is_used(const struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr)
static struct mlxsw_sp_vr *mlxsw_sp_vr_find_unused(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
+ int max_vrs = MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS);
struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_vrs; i++) {
vr = &mlxsw_sp->router->vrs[i];
if (!mlxsw_sp_vr_is_used(vr))
return vr;
@@ -792,12 +793,13 @@ static u32 mlxsw_sp_fix_tb_id(u32 tb_id)
static struct mlxsw_sp_vr *mlxsw_sp_vr_find(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
u32 tb_id)
{
+ int max_vrs = MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS);
struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr;
int i;
tb_id = mlxsw_sp_fix_tb_id(tb_id);
- for (i = 0; i < MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_vrs; i++) {
vr = &mlxsw_sp->router->vrs[i];
if (mlxsw_sp_vr_is_used(vr) && vr->tb_id == tb_id)
return vr;
@@ -959,6 +961,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_vrs_lpm_tree_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
struct mlxsw_sp_fib *fib,
struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *new_tree)
{
+ int max_vrs = MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS);
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto = fib->proto;
struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *old_tree;
u8 old_id, new_id = new_tree->id;
@@ -968,7 +971,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_vrs_lpm_tree_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
old_tree = mlxsw_sp->router->lpm.proto_trees[proto];
old_id = old_tree->id;
- for (i = 0; i < MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_vrs; i++) {
vr = &mlxsw_sp->router->vrs[i];
if (!mlxsw_sp_vr_lpm_tree_should_replace(vr, proto, old_id))
continue;
@@ -7298,9 +7301,10 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_vr_fib_flush(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
+ int max_vrs = MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS);
int i, j;
- for (i = 0; i < MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET(mlxsw_sp->core, MAX_VRS); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_vrs; i++) {
struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr = &mlxsw_sp->router->vrs[i];
if (!mlxsw_sp_vr_is_used(vr))
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 16:20 [PATCH net-next 0/8] mlxsw, selftests: Cleanups Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Clarify a comment Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use extack in mlxsw_sp~_rif_ipip_lb_configure() Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Do not query MAX_RIFS on each iteration Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` Petr Machata [this message]
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] selftests: mlxsw: ingress_rif_conf_1d: Fix the diagram Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] selftests: mlxsw: egress_vid_classification: " Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] selftests: router_bridge_vlan: Add a diagram Petr Machata
2023-06-02 16:20 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests: router_bridge_vlan: Set vlan_default_pvid 0 on the bridge Petr Machata
2023-06-05 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] mlxsw, selftests: Cleanups patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e14a05ab55f8fce70ad4c6821a83f910f9b6a88.1685720841.git.petrm@nvidia.com \
--to=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox