* [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add perfbuf multi-producer benchmark
@ 2026-01-20 9:07 Gyutae Bae
2026-01-20 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gyutae Bae @ 2026-01-20 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, shuah,
linux-kselftest, gyutae.bae
From: Gyutae Bae <gyutae.bae@navercorp.com>
Add a multi-producer benchmark for perfbuf to complement the existing
ringbuf multi-producer test. Unlike ringbuf which uses a shared buffer
and experiences contention, perfbuf uses per-CPU buffers so the test
measures scaling behavior rather than contention.
This allows developers to compare perfbuf vs ringbuf performance under
multi-producer workloads when choosing between the two for their systems.
Signed-off-by: Gyutae Bae <gyutae.bae@navercorp.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh
index 83e05e837871..123b7feb6935 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh
@@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ for b in 1 2 3 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52; do
summarize "rb-libbpf nr_prod $b" "$($RUN_RB_BENCH -p$b --rb-batch-cnt 50 rb-libbpf)"
done
+header "Perfbuf, multi-producer"
+for b in 1 2 3 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52; do
+ summarize "pb-libbpf nr_prod $b" "$($RUN_RB_BENCH -p$b --rb-batch-cnt 50 --rb-sample-rate 50 pb-libbpf)"
+done
+
header "Ringbuf, multi-producer contention in overwrite mode, no consumer"
for b in 1 2 3 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52; do
summarize "rb-prod nr_prod $b" "$($RUN_BENCH -p$b --rb-batch-cnt 50 --rb-overwrite --rb-bench-producer rb-libbpf)"
--
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add perfbuf multi-producer benchmark
2026-01-20 9:07 [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add perfbuf multi-producer benchmark Gyutae Bae
@ 2026-01-20 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-01-20 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gyutae Bae
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song,
yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, shuah,
linux-kselftest, gyutae.bae
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:07:16 +0900 you wrote:
> From: Gyutae Bae <gyutae.bae@navercorp.com>
>
> Add a multi-producer benchmark for perfbuf to complement the existing
> ringbuf multi-producer test. Unlike ringbuf which uses a shared buffer
> and experiences contention, perfbuf uses per-CPU buffers so the test
> measures scaling behavior rather than contention.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- selftests/bpf: Add perfbuf multi-producer benchmark
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2e6690d4f7fc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-20 19:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-20 9:07 [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add perfbuf multi-producer benchmark Gyutae Bae
2026-01-20 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox