From: brendanhiggins at google.com (Brendan Higgins)
Subject: [RFC v3 19/19] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:36:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128193636.254378-20-brendanhiggins@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181128193636.254378-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
Split up the super large test cases of_unittest_find_node_by_name and
of_unittest_dynamic into properly sized and defined test cases.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins at google.com>
---
drivers/of/base-test.c | 315 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 260 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base-test.c b/drivers/of/base-test.c
index 5731787a3fca8..46c3dd9ce6628 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base-test.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base-test.c
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
#include "test-common.h"
-static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
- const char *options, *name;
+ const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
@@ -20,11 +20,21 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find /testcase-data failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
/* Test if trailing '/' works */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
"trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *name;
+
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
@@ -33,6 +43,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -41,10 +57,23 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find testcase-alias failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
- "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
+ "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * TODO(brendanhiggins at google.com): This looks like a duplicate of
+ * of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
+ */
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -54,29 +83,60 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
- of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"),
+ np = of_find_node_by_path(
+ "/testcase-data/missing-path"),
NULL,
- "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
+ "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
+}
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
- "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
+ "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
+ struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
- of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"),
+ np = of_find_node_by_path(
+ "testcase-alias/missing-path"),
NULL,
- "non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
- np);
+ "non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
+ np);
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
"option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -91,11 +151,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
"option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
"NULL option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
&options);
@@ -103,6 +174,13 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
"option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
+ struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
&options);
@@ -110,11 +188,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
"option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
- "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
+ test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
@@ -122,6 +211,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
"option clearing test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
@@ -131,64 +226,147 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
of_node_put(np);
}
-static void of_unittest_dynamic(struct kunit *test)
+static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
{
+ /* adding data for unittest */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
+
+ if (!of_aliases)
+ of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
+ "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
+ .name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
+ .init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
+ .test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
+};
+module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
+
+struct of_test_dynamic_context {
struct device_node *np;
- struct property *prop;
+ struct property *prop0;
+ struct property *prop1;
+};
- np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
+static void of_test_dynamic_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
- /* Array of 4 properties for the purpose of testing */
- prop = kcalloc(4, sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop);
+ /* Add a new property - should pass*/
+ prop0->name = "new-property";
+ prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
+ "Adding a new property failed\n");
+
+ /* Test that we can remove a property */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, of_remove_property(np, prop0), 0);
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
/* Add a new property - should pass*/
- prop->name = "new-property";
- prop->value = "new-property-data";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop0->name = "new-property";
+ prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
"Adding a new property failed\n");
/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
- prop++;
- prop->name = "new-property";
- prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop1->name = "new-property";
+ prop1->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
+ prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop1), 0,
"Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
+
+ /* Add a new property - should pass*/
+ prop0->name = "new-property";
+ prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
+ "Adding a new property failed\n");
/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
- prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop1->name = "new-property";
+ prop1->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
+ prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop1), 0,
"Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
/* Try to modify non-existent property - should pass*/
- prop++;
- prop->name = "modify-property";
- prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop0->name = "modify-property";
+ prop0->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop0), 0,
"Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
+}
- /* Remove property - should pass */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_remove_property(np, prop), 0,
- "Removing a property should have passed\n");
+static void of_test_dynamic_large_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
/* Adding very large property - should pass */
- prop++;
- prop->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
- prop->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
- prop->value = kzalloc(prop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop->value);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop0->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
+ prop0->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
+ prop0->value = kunit_kzalloc(test, prop0->length, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop0->value);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
"Adding a large property should have passed\n");
}
-static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+static int of_test_dynamic_init(struct kunit *test)
{
- /* adding data for unittest */
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx;
+
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
if (!of_aliases)
@@ -197,18 +375,45 @@ static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
+ ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
+ test->priv = ctx;
+
+ ctx->np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->np);
+
+ ctx->prop0 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop0), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop0);
+
+ ctx->prop1 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop1), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop1);
+
return 0;
}
-static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
- KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
- KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_dynamic),
+static void of_test_dynamic_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+
+ of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop0);
+ of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop1);
+ of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case of_test_dynamic_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_large_property),
{},
};
-static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
- .name = "of-base-test",
- .init = of_test_init,
- .test_cases = of_test_cases,
+static struct kunit_module of_test_dynamic_module = {
+ .name = "of-dynamic-test",
+ .init = of_test_dynamic_init,
+ .exit = of_test_dynamic_exit,
+ .test_cases = of_test_dynamic_cases,
};
-module_test(of_test_module);
+module_test(of_test_dynamic_module);
--
2.20.0.rc0.387.gc7a69e6b6c-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: brendanhiggins@google.com (Brendan Higgins)
Subject: [RFC v3 19/19] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:36:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128193636.254378-20-brendanhiggins@google.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181128193636.jt0SeDzi-mEnDMxSzLvEWBmJgNhHXp64a7NWCO6ssjU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181128193636.254378-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
Split up the super large test cases of_unittest_find_node_by_name and
of_unittest_dynamic into properly sized and defined test cases.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins at google.com>
---
drivers/of/base-test.c | 315 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 260 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base-test.c b/drivers/of/base-test.c
index 5731787a3fca8..46c3dd9ce6628 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base-test.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base-test.c
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
#include "test-common.h"
-static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
{
struct device_node *np;
- const char *options, *name;
+ const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
@@ -20,11 +20,21 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find /testcase-data failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
/* Test if trailing '/' works */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
"trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *name;
+
np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
@@ -33,6 +43,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -41,10 +57,23 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find testcase-alias failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
/* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
- "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
+ "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * TODO(brendanhiggins at google.com): This looks like a duplicate of
+ * of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
+ */
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *name;
np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -54,29 +83,60 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
"find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
kfree(name);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
- of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"),
+ np = of_find_node_by_path(
+ "/testcase-data/missing-path"),
NULL,
- "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
+ "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
+}
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
- "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
+ "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
+ struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
- of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"),
+ np = of_find_node_by_path(
+ "testcase-alias/missing-path"),
NULL,
- "non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
- np);
+ "non-existent alias with relative path returned node %pOF\n",
+ np);
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
"option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -91,11 +151,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
"option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
"NULL option path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
&options);
@@ -103,6 +174,13 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
"option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
+ struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
&options);
@@ -110,11 +188,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
"option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
- "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
+ test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
@@ -122,6 +211,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
"option clearing test failed\n");
of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ const char *options;
options = "testoption";
np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
@@ -131,64 +226,147 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
of_node_put(np);
}
-static void of_unittest_dynamic(struct kunit *test)
+static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
{
+ /* adding data for unittest */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
+
+ if (!of_aliases)
+ of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
+ "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
+ .name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
+ .init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
+ .test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
+};
+module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
+
+struct of_test_dynamic_context {
struct device_node *np;
- struct property *prop;
+ struct property *prop0;
+ struct property *prop1;
+};
- np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
+static void of_test_dynamic_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
- /* Array of 4 properties for the purpose of testing */
- prop = kcalloc(4, sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop);
+ /* Add a new property - should pass*/
+ prop0->name = "new-property";
+ prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
+ "Adding a new property failed\n");
+
+ /* Test that we can remove a property */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, of_remove_property(np, prop0), 0);
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
/* Add a new property - should pass*/
- prop->name = "new-property";
- prop->value = "new-property-data";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop0->name = "new-property";
+ prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
"Adding a new property failed\n");
/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
- prop++;
- prop->name = "new-property";
- prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop1->name = "new-property";
+ prop1->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
+ prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop1), 0,
"Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
+
+ /* Add a new property - should pass*/
+ prop0->name = "new-property";
+ prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
+ "Adding a new property failed\n");
/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
- prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop1->name = "new-property";
+ prop1->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
+ prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop1), 0,
"Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
/* Try to modify non-existent property - should pass*/
- prop++;
- prop->name = "modify-property";
- prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop0->name = "modify-property";
+ prop0->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
+ prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop0), 0,
"Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
+}
- /* Remove property - should pass */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_remove_property(np, prop), 0,
- "Removing a property should have passed\n");
+static void of_test_dynamic_large_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+ struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
/* Adding very large property - should pass */
- prop++;
- prop->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
- prop->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
- prop->value = kzalloc(prop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop->value);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+ prop0->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
+ prop0->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
+ prop0->value = kunit_kzalloc(test, prop0->length, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop0->value);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
"Adding a large property should have passed\n");
}
-static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+static int of_test_dynamic_init(struct kunit *test)
{
- /* adding data for unittest */
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx;
+
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
if (!of_aliases)
@@ -197,18 +375,45 @@ static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
"/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
+ ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
+ test->priv = ctx;
+
+ ctx->np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->np);
+
+ ctx->prop0 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop0), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop0);
+
+ ctx->prop1 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop1), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop1);
+
return 0;
}
-static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
- KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
- KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_dynamic),
+static void of_test_dynamic_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+
+ of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop0);
+ of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop1);
+ of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case of_test_dynamic_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property),
+ KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_large_property),
{},
};
-static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
- .name = "of-base-test",
- .init = of_test_init,
- .test_cases = of_test_cases,
+static struct kunit_module of_test_dynamic_module = {
+ .name = "of-dynamic-test",
+ .init = of_test_dynamic_init,
+ .exit = of_test_dynamic_exit,
+ .test_cases = of_test_dynamic_cases,
};
-module_test(of_test_module);
+module_test(of_test_dynamic_module);
--
2.20.0.rc0.387.gc7a69e6b6c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 232+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-28 19:36 [RFC v3 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 01/19] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:14 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:14 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 1:51 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 1:51 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 2:57 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 2:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-05 13:15 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-05 13:15 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-12-05 14:45 ` arnd
2018-12-05 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-05 14:49 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-05 14:49 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-11-30 3:28 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 2:08 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 2:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:10 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 22:47 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 22:47 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:02 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:02 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 02/19] kunit: test: add test resource management API brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 03/19] kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:29 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-01 2:14 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-01 2:14 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-01 3:12 ` mcgrof
2018-12-01 3:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 10:55 ` pmladek
2018-12-03 10:55 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-04 0:35 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 04/19] kunit: test: add test_stream a std::stream like logger brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 05/19] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 06/19] arch: um: enable running kunit from User Mode Linux brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 21:26 ` robh
2018-11-28 21:26 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-30 3:37 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:37 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-30 14:05 ` robh
2018-11-30 14:05 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-30 18:22 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 18:22 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:22 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:22 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:30 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 07/19] kunit: test: add initial tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:40 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:26 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:26 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-03 23:43 ` mcgrof
2018-12-03 23:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 08/19] arch: um: add shim to trap to allow installing a fault catcher for tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:34 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:34 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:34 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-03 23:46 ` mcgrof
2018-12-03 23:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-04 0:44 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:41 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:41 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:37 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 09/19] kunit: test: add the concept of assertions brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 10/19] kunit: test: add test managed resource tests brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 11/19] kunit: add Python libraries for handing KUnit config and kernel brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-29 13:54 ` kieran.bingham
2018-11-29 13:54 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-03 23:48 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:48 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 20:47 ` mcgrof
2018-12-04 20:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-06 12:32 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-06 12:32 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-06 15:37 ` willy
2018-12-06 15:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-07 11:30 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-07 11:30 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-11 14:09 ` pmladek
2018-12-11 14:09 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-11 14:41 ` rostedt
2018-12-11 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-11 17:01 ` anton.ivanov
2018-12-11 17:01 ` Anton Ivanov
2019-02-09 0:40 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-09 0:40 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-07 1:05 ` mcgrof
2018-12-07 1:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-07 18:35 ` kent.overstreet
2018-12-07 18:35 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-11-30 3:44 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:50 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:50 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 20:48 ` mcgrof
2018-12-04 20:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 12/19] kunit: add KUnit wrapper script and simple output parser brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 13/19] kunit: improve output from python wrapper brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 14/19] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-29 13:56 ` kieran.bingham
2018-11-29 13:56 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-11-30 3:45 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-03 23:53 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-03 23:53 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-06 12:16 ` kieran.bingham
2018-12-06 12:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-09 0:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-09 0:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-11 12:16 ` kieran.bingham
2019-02-11 12:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-12 22:10 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-12 22:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-13 21:55 ` kieran.bingham
2019-02-13 21:55 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-02-14 0:17 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 0:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 17:26 ` mcgrof
2019-02-14 17:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-14 22:07 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 22:07 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 15/19] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 16/19] arch: um: make UML unflatten device tree when testing brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 21:16 ` robh
2018-11-28 21:16 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-04 0:00 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:00 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-30 3:46 ` mcgrof
2018-11-30 3:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2018-12-04 0:02 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:02 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 17/19] of: unittest: migrate tests to run on KUnit brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:56 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:56 ` Frank Rowand
[not found] ` <CAL_Jsq+09Kx7yMBC_Jw45QGmk6U_fp4N6HOZDwYrM4tWw+_dOA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-30 0:39 ` rdunlap
2018-11-30 0:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-12-04 0:13 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:13 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 13:40 ` robh
2018-12-04 13:40 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-05 23:42 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:42 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-07 0:41 ` robh
2018-12-07 0:41 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-04 0:08 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-04 0:08 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-13 1:44 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-13 1:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 20:10 ` robh
2019-02-14 20:10 ` Rob Herring
2019-02-14 21:52 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-14 21:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-18 22:56 ` frowand.list
2019-02-18 22:56 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-28 0:29 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-28 0:29 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 18/19] of: unittest: split out a couple of test cases from unittest brendanhiggins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:58 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:58 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-05 23:54 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:54 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-14 23:57 ` frowand.list
2019-02-14 23:57 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-15 0:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-15 0:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-15 2:05 ` frowand.list
2019-02-15 2:05 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-15 10:56 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-15 10:56 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-02-18 22:25 ` frowand.list
2019-02-18 22:25 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-20 20:44 ` frowand.list
2019-02-20 20:44 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-20 20:47 ` frowand.list
2019-02-20 20:47 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-28 3:52 ` brendanhiggins
2019-02-28 3:52 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 0:22 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 0:22 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-22 1:30 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-22 1:30 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 1:47 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 1:47 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:15 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:15 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-09-20 16:57 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-21 23:57 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-22 1:34 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 1:34 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:18 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:18 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-11-28 19:36 ` brendanhiggins [this message]
2018-11-28 19:36 ` [RFC v3 19/19] of: unittest: split up some super large test cases Brendan Higgins
2018-12-04 10:52 ` [RFC v3 00/19] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework frowand.list
2018-12-04 10:52 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-04 11:40 ` frowand.list
2018-12-04 11:40 ` Frank Rowand
2018-12-04 13:49 ` robh
2018-12-04 13:49 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-05 23:10 ` brendanhiggins
2018-12-05 23:10 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-03-22 0:27 ` frowand.list
2019-03-22 0:27 ` Frank Rowand
2019-03-25 22:04 ` brendanhiggins
2019-03-25 22:04 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181128193636.254378-20-brendanhiggins@google.com \
--to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox