diff for duplicates of <20190523073425.GA43379@MBP.local> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 8e242fc..a5da22f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 04:09:31PM -0700, enh wrote: -> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 4:03 PM Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote: -> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 1:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote: -> > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: +On Wed, May 22, 2019@04:09:31PM -0700, enh wrote: +> On Wed, May 22, 2019@4:03 PM Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com> wrote: +> > On Wed, May 22, 2019@1:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: +> > > On Wed, May 22, 2019@05:35:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > I would also expect the C library or dynamic loader to check for the > > > > presence of a HWCAP_MTE bit before starting to tag memory allocations, > > > > otherwise it would get SIGILL on the first MTE instruction it tries to diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e6e55da..c62849f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ "ref\0201905221316.865581CF@keescook\0" "ref\0CAFKCwrjOjdJAbcABp3qxwyYy+hgfyQirvmqGkDSJVJe5pSz0Uw@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\0CAJgzZorUPzrXu0ysDdKwnqdvgWZJ9tqRjF-9_5CU_UV+c0bRCA@mail.gmail.com\0" - "From\0catalin.marinas at arm.com (Catalin Marinas)\0" + "From\0catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)\0" "Subject\0[PATCH v15 00/17] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel\0" "Date\0Thu, 23 May 2019 08:34:25 +0100\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 04:09:31PM -0700, enh wrote:\n" - "> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 4:03 PM Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote:\n" - "> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 1:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:\n" - "> > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n" + "On Wed, May 22, 2019@04:09:31PM -0700, enh wrote:\n" + "> On Wed, May 22, 2019@4:03 PM Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com> wrote:\n" + "> > On Wed, May 22, 2019@1:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:\n" + "> > > On Wed, May 22, 2019@05:35:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n" "> > > > I would also expect the C library or dynamic loader to check for the\n" "> > > > presence of a HWCAP_MTE bit before starting to tag memory allocations,\n" "> > > > otherwise it would get SIGILL on the first MTE instruction it tries to\n" @@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ "-- \n" Catalin -b1d9d213ab6a78a524665725ee61b104935e2b931e74aa9a52bfb3041c9fa0df +4da6becedeeeb1c07b69875b14f30c7c2dc06ab91d260c96fe6fcdc3827bbf11
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox