* [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters
@ 2020-10-06 20:44 Shuah Khan
2020-10-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters Shuah Khan
2020-10-07 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters Kees Cook
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2020-10-06 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: corbet, keescook, gregkh, shuah, rafael, johannes, lenb,
james.morse, tony.luck, bp, arve, tkjos, maco, joel, christian,
hridya, surenb, minyard, arnd, mchehab, rric
Cc: Shuah Khan, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, linux-acpi,
devel, openipmi-developer, linux-edac
This patch series is a result of discussion at the refcount_t BOF
the Linux Plumbers Conference. In this discussion, we identified
a need for looking closely and investigating atomic_t usages in
the kernel when it is used strictly as a counter without it
controlling object lifetimes and state changes.
There are a number of atomic_t usages in the kernel where atomic_t api
is used strictly for counting and not for managing object lifetime. In
some cases, atomic_t might not even be needed.
The purpose of these counters is to clearly differentiate atomic_t
counters from atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes, hence prone
to overflow and underflow errors. It allows tools that scan for underflow
and overflow on atomic_t usages to detect overflow and underflows to scan
just the cases that are prone to errors.
Simple atomic counters api provides interfaces for simple atomic counters
that just count, and don't guard resource lifetimes. Counter will wrap
around to 0 when it overflows and should not be used to guard resource
lifetimes, device usage and open counts that control state changes, and
pm states.
Using counter_atomic* to guard lifetimes could lead to use-after free
when it overflows and undefined behavior when used to manage state
changes and device usage/open states.
This patch series introduces Simple atomic counters. Counter atomic ops
leverage atomic_t and provide a sub-set of atomic_t ops.
In addition this patch series converts a few drivers to use the new api.
The following criteria is used for select variables for conversion:
1. Variable doesn't guard object lifetimes, manage state changes e.g:
device usage counts, device open counts, and pm states.
2. Variable is used for stats and counters.
3. The conversion doesn't change the overflow behavior.
Changes since Patch v1
-- Thanks for reviews and reviewed-by, and Acked-by tags. Updated
the patches with the tags.
-- Addressed Kees's and Joel's comments:
1. Removed dec_return interfaces (Patch 1/11)
2. Removed counter_simple interfaces to be added later with changes
to drivers that use them (if any) (Patch 1/11)
3. Comment and Changelogs updates to Patch 2/11
Kees, if this series is good, would you like to take this through your
tree or would you like to take this through mine?
Changes since RFC:
-- Thanks for reviews and reviewed-by, and Acked-by tags. Updated
the patches with the tags.
-- Addressed Kees's comments:
1. Non-atomic counters renamed to counter_simple32 and counter_simple64
to clearly indicate size.
2. Added warning for counter_simple* usage and it should be used only
when there is no need for atomicity.
3. Renamed counter_atomic to counter_atomic32 to clearly indicate size.
4. Renamed counter_atomic_long to counter_atomic64 and it now uses
atomic64_t ops and indicates size.
5. Test updated for the API renames.
6. Added helper functions for test results printing
7. Verified that the test module compiles in kunit env. and test
module can be loaded to run the test.
8. Updated Documentation to reflect the intent to make the API
restricted so it can never be used to guard object lifetimes
and state management. I left _return ops for now, inc_return
is necessary for now as per the discussion we had on this topic.
-- Updated driver patches with API name changes.
-- We discussed if binder counters can be non-atomic. For now I left
them the same as the RFC patch - using counter_atomic32
-- Unrelated to this patch series:
The patch series review uncovered improvements could be made to
test_async_driver_probe and vmw_vmci/vmci_guest. I will track
these for fixing later.
Shuah Khan (11):
counters: Introduce counter_atomic* counters
selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters
drivers/base: convert deferred_trigger_count and probe_count to
counter_atomic32
drivers/base/devcoredump: convert devcd_count to counter_atomic32
drivers/acpi: convert seqno counter_atomic32
drivers/acpi/apei: convert seqno counter_atomic32
drivers/android/binder: convert stats, transaction_log to
counter_atomic32
drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe: convert to use
counter_atomic32
drivers/char/ipmi: convert stats to use counter_atomic32
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci: convert num guest devices counter to
counter_atomic32
drivers/edac: convert pci counters to counter_atomic32
Documentation/core-api/counters.rst | 103 +++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 8 +
drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c | 5 +-
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 5 +-
drivers/android/binder.c | 41 ++---
drivers/android/binder_internal.h | 3 +-
drivers/base/dd.c | 19 +-
drivers/base/devcoredump.c | 5 +-
drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c | 23 +--
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 9 +-
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 9 +-
drivers/edac/edac_pci.h | 5 +-
drivers/edac/edac_pci_sysfs.c | 28 +--
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c | 9 +-
include/linux/counters.h | 173 +++++++++++++++++++
lib/Kconfig | 10 ++
lib/Makefile | 1 +
lib/test_counters.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/lib/Makefile | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/lib/config | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh | 5 +
21 files changed, 546 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/core-api/counters.rst
create mode 100644 include/linux/counters.h
create mode 100644 lib/test_counters.c
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters
2020-10-06 20:44 [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters Shuah Khan
@ 2020-10-06 20:44 ` Shuah Khan
2020-10-07 18:12 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-07 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters Kees Cook
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2020-10-06 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shuah, keescook, gregkh; +Cc: Shuah Khan, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest
Add a new selftest for testing counter_atomic* Counters API. This test
load test_counters test modules and unloads.
The test module runs tests and prints results in dmesg.
There are a number of atomic_t usages in the kernel where atomic_t api
is used strictly for counting and not for managing object lifetime. In
some cases, atomic_t might not even be needed.
The purpose of these counters is to clearly differentiate atomic_t
counters from atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes, hence prone
to overflow and underflow errors. It allows tools that scan for underflow
and overflow on atomic_t usages to detect overflow and underflows to scan
just the cases that are prone to errors.
Simple atomic counters api provides interfaces for simple atomic counters
that just count, and don't guard resource lifetimes. Counter will wrap
around to 0 when it overflows and should not be used to guard resource
lifetimes, device usage and open counts that control state changes, and
pm states.
Using counter_atomic* to guard lifetimes could lead to use-after free
when it overflows and undefined behavior when used to manage state
changes and device usage/open states.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/lib/Makefile | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/lib/config | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4e82d0ffcab0..26719b8dd48e 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -15845,6 +15845,7 @@ L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
S: Maintained
F: include/linux/counters.h
F: lib/test_counters.c
+F: tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh
SIMPLE FIRMWARE INTERFACE (SFI)
S: Obsolete
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/Makefile
index a105f094676e..e8960d7934e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/Makefile
@@ -5,5 +5,6 @@
all:
TEST_PROGS := printf.sh bitmap.sh prime_numbers.sh strscpy.sh
+TEST_PROGS += test_counters.sh
include ../lib.mk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/config b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/config
index b80ee3f6e265..6ed25024d371 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/config
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ CONFIG_TEST_BITMAP=m
CONFIG_PRIME_NUMBERS=m
CONFIG_TEST_STRSCPY=m
CONFIG_TEST_BITOPS=m
+CONFIG_TEST_COUNTERS=m
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..c8731aef2498
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/test_counters.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Tests the Simple Atomic Counters interfaces using test_counters
+# kernel module
+$(dirname $0)/../kselftest/module.sh "test_counters" test_counters
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters
2020-10-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters Shuah Khan
@ 2020-10-07 18:12 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2020-10-07 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan; +Cc: shuah, gregkh, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:44:33PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Add a new selftest for testing counter_atomic* Counters API. This test
> load test_counters test modules and unloads.
>
> The test module runs tests and prints results in dmesg.
>
> There are a number of atomic_t usages in the kernel where atomic_t api
> is used strictly for counting and not for managing object lifetime. In
> some cases, atomic_t might not even be needed.
>
> The purpose of these counters is to clearly differentiate atomic_t
> counters from atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes, hence prone
> to overflow and underflow errors. It allows tools that scan for underflow
> and overflow on atomic_t usages to detect overflow and underflows to scan
> just the cases that are prone to errors.
>
> Simple atomic counters api provides interfaces for simple atomic counters
> that just count, and don't guard resource lifetimes. Counter will wrap
> around to 0 when it overflows and should not be used to guard resource
> lifetimes, device usage and open counts that control state changes, and
> pm states.
>
> Using counter_atomic* to guard lifetimes could lead to use-after free
> when it overflows and undefined behavior when used to manage state
> changes and device usage/open states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters
2020-10-06 20:44 [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters Shuah Khan
2020-10-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters Shuah Khan
@ 2020-10-07 18:30 ` Kees Cook
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2020-10-07 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan
Cc: corbet, gregkh, shuah, rafael, johannes, lenb, james.morse,
tony.luck, bp, arve, tkjos, maco, joel, christian, hridya, surenb,
minyard, arnd, mchehab, rric, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
linux-kselftest, linux-acpi, devel, openipmi-developer,
linux-edac
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:44:31PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> -- Addressed Kees's and Joel's comments:
> 1. Removed dec_return interfaces (Patch 1/11)
> 2. Removed counter_simple interfaces to be added later with changes
> to drivers that use them (if any) (Patch 1/11)
> 3. Comment and Changelogs updates to Patch 2/11
Thanks!
> Kees, if this series is good, would you like to take this through your
> tree or would you like to take this through mine?
I think it's very close! I've sent reviews. Why don't you take this tree
for now? (Originally I thought this was going through Greg's tree since
it was touching a lot of drivers.)
--
Kees Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-07 18:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-06 20:44 [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters Shuah Khan
2020-10-06 20:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests:lib:test_counters: add new test for counters Shuah Khan
2020-10-07 18:12 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-07 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic counters Kees Cook
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox