public inbox for linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] kselftest/arm64: Refactor parameter checking in mte_switch_mode()
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:43:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310144335.2097457-4-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310144335.2097457-1-broonie@kernel.org>

Currently we just have a big if statement with a non-specific diagnostic
checking both the mode and the tag. Since we'll need to dynamically check
for asymmetric mode support in the system and to improve debugability split
these checks out.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
index 24b0c14203cb..9b4529ef2b29 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
@@ -271,9 +271,18 @@ int mte_switch_mode(int mte_option, unsigned long incl_mask)
 {
 	unsigned long en = 0;
 
-	if (!(mte_option == MTE_SYNC_ERR || mte_option == MTE_ASYNC_ERR ||
-	      mte_option == MTE_NONE_ERR || incl_mask <= MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG)) {
-		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid mte config option\n");
+	switch (mte_option) {
+	case MTE_NONE_ERR:
+	case MTE_SYNC_ERR:
+	case MTE_ASYNC_ERR:
+		break;
+	default:
+		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid MTE option %x\n", mte_option);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!(incl_mask <= MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG)) {
+		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid incl_mask %lx\n", incl_mask);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	en = PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 14:43 [PATCH v1 0/4] kselftest/arm64: Miscelaneous MTE test updates Mark Brown
2022-03-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] kselftest/arm64: Handle more kselftest result codes in MTE helpers Mark Brown
2022-03-10 19:40   ` Shuah Khan
2022-03-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] kselftest/arm64: Log unexpected asynchronous MTE faults Mark Brown
2022-03-10 20:04   ` Shuah Khan
2022-03-10 14:43 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-03-10 20:05   ` [PATCH v1 3/4] kselftest/arm64: Refactor parameter checking in mte_switch_mode() Shuah Khan
2022-03-10 14:43 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] kselftest/arm64: Add simple test for MTE prctl Mark Brown
2022-03-10 15:33   ` Joey Gouly
2022-03-10 15:37     ` Mark Brown
2022-03-10 20:07   ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220310144335.2097457-4-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox