From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 05/10] kselftest/arm64: Remove unneeded protype for validate_extra_context()
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:32:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815133236.235464-6-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815133236.235464-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Nothing outside testcases.c should need to use validate_extra_context(),
remove the prototype to ensure nothing does.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h
index 49f1d5de7b5b..b39f538c7be1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h
@@ -79,8 +79,6 @@ struct fake_sigframe {
bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err);
-bool validate_extra_context(struct extra_context *extra, char **err);
-
struct _aarch64_ctx *get_header(struct _aarch64_ctx *head, uint32_t magic,
size_t resv_sz, size_t *offset);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 13:32 [PATCH v1 00/10] kselftest/arm64: EXTRA_CONTEXT related fixes Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] kselftest/arm64: Enumerate SME rather than SVE vector lengths for za_regs Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate signal ucontext in place Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validatation termination record after EXTRA_CONTEXT Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate contents of EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] kselftest/arm64: Preserve any EXTRA_CONTEXT in handle_signal_copyctx() Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers in get_signal_context() Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] kselftest/arm64: Include larger SVE and SME VLs in signal tests Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220815133236.235464-6-broonie@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox