From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 06/10] kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:32:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815133236.235464-7-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815133236.235464-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Currently for the more complex signal context types we validate the context
specific details the end of the parsing loop validate_reserved() if we've
ever seen a context of that type. This is currently merely a bit inefficient
but will get a bit awkward when we start parsing extra_context, at which
point we will need to reset the head to advance into the extra space that
extra_context provides. Instead only do the more detailed checks on each
context type the first time we see that context type.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
.../arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
index 16dc916939f9..0b3c9b4b1d39 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
bool terminated = false;
size_t offs = 0;
int flags = 0;
+ int new_flags;
struct extra_context *extra = NULL;
struct sve_context *sve = NULL;
struct za_context *za = NULL;
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
return false;
}
+ new_flags = 0;
+
switch (head->magic) {
case 0:
if (head->size)
@@ -133,7 +136,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
else if (head->size !=
sizeof(struct fpsimd_context))
*err = "Bad size for fpsimd_context";
- flags |= FPSIMD_CTX;
+ new_flags |= FPSIMD_CTX;
break;
case ESR_MAGIC:
if (head->size != sizeof(struct esr_context))
@@ -144,14 +147,14 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
*err = "Multiple SVE_MAGIC";
/* Size is validated in validate_sve_context() */
sve = (struct sve_context *)head;
- flags |= SVE_CTX;
+ new_flags |= SVE_CTX;
break;
case ZA_MAGIC:
if (flags & ZA_CTX)
*err = "Multiple ZA_MAGIC";
/* Size is validated in validate_za_context() */
za = (struct za_context *)head;
- flags |= ZA_CTX;
+ new_flags |= ZA_CTX;
break;
case EXTRA_MAGIC:
if (flags & EXTRA_CTX)
@@ -159,7 +162,7 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
else if (head->size !=
sizeof(struct extra_context))
*err = "Bad size for extra_context";
- flags |= EXTRA_CTX;
+ new_flags |= EXTRA_CTX;
extra = (struct extra_context *)head;
break;
case KSFT_BAD_MAGIC:
@@ -192,16 +195,18 @@ bool validate_reserved(ucontext_t *uc, size_t resv_sz, char **err)
return false;
}
- if (flags & EXTRA_CTX)
+ if (new_flags & EXTRA_CTX)
if (!validate_extra_context(extra, err))
return false;
- if (flags & SVE_CTX)
+ if (new_flags & SVE_CTX)
if (!validate_sve_context(sve, err))
return false;
- if (flags & ZA_CTX)
+ if (new_flags & ZA_CTX)
if (!validate_za_context(za, err))
return false;
+ flags |= new_flags;
+
head = GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD(head);
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 13:32 [PATCH v1 00/10] kselftest/arm64: EXTRA_CONTEXT related fixes Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] kselftest/arm64: Enumerate SME rather than SVE vector lengths for za_regs Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate signal ucontext in place Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validatation termination record after EXTRA_CONTEXT Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] kselftest/arm64: Remove unneeded protype for validate_extra_context() Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] kselftest/arm64: Validate contents of EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] kselftest/arm64: Preserve any EXTRA_CONTEXT in handle_signal_copyctx() Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers in get_signal_context() Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:32 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] kselftest/arm64: Include larger SVE and SME VLs in signal tests Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220815133236.235464-7-broonie@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox