Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/6] selftests/resctrl: Fix set up schemata with 100% allocation on first run in MBM test
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:22:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413072259.2089348-2-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413072259.2089348-1-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>

There is a comment "Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run"
in function mbm_setup(), but there is an increment bug and the condition
"num_of_runs == 0" will never be met and write_schemata() will never be
called to set schemata to 100%. Even if write_schemata() is called in MBM
test, since it is not supported for MBM test it does not set the schemata.
This is currently fine because resctrl_val_parm->mum_resctrlfs is always 1
and umount/mount will be run in each test to set the schemata to 100%.

To support the usage when MBM test does not unmount/remount resctrl
filesystem before the test starts, fix to call write_schemata() and
set schemata properly when the function is called for the first time.

Also, remove static local variable 'num_of_runs' because this is not
needed as there is resctrl_val_param->num_of_runs which should be used
instead like in cat_setup().

Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c  | 13 +++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index c9dfa54af42f..9b591c35310f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -89,23 +89,24 @@ static int check_results(int span)
 static int mbm_setup(int num, ...)
 {
 	struct resctrl_val_param *p;
-	static int num_of_runs;
 	va_list param;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	/* Run NUM_OF_RUNS times */
-	if (num_of_runs++ >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
-		return END_OF_TESTS;
-
 	va_start(param, num);
 	p = va_arg(param, struct resctrl_val_param *);
 	va_end(param);
 
+	/* Run NUM_OF_RUNS times */
+	if (p->num_of_runs >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
+		return -1;
+
 	/* Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run. */
-	if (num_of_runs == 0)
+	if (p->num_of_runs == 0)
 		ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", p->cpu_no,
 				     p->resctrl_val);
 
+	p->num_of_runs++;
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index cc6cf49e3129..b31b1d9e41d1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
 	FILE *fp;
 
 	if (strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR)) &&
+	    strncmp(resctrl_val, MBM_STR, sizeof(MBM_STR)) &&
 	    strncmp(resctrl_val, CAT_STR, sizeof(CAT_STR)) &&
 	    strncmp(resctrl_val, CMT_STR, sizeof(CMT_STR)))
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -523,7 +524,8 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
 	if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, CAT_STR, sizeof(CAT_STR)) ||
 	    !strncmp(resctrl_val, CMT_STR, sizeof(CMT_STR)))
 		sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
-	if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR)))
+	if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR)) ||
+	    !strncmp(resctrl_val, MBM_STR, sizeof(MBM_STR)))
 		sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
 
 	fp = fopen(controlgroup, "w");
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-13  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13  7:22 [PATCH v9 0/6] Some improvements of resctrl selftest Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13  7:22 ` Shaopeng Tan [this message]
2023-04-14 12:31   ` [PATCH v9 1/6] selftests/resctrl: Fix set up schemata with 100% allocation on first run in MBM test Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-14 15:24     ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-13  7:22 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] selftests/resctrl: Return MBA check result and make it to output message Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13  7:22 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests/resctrl: Flush stdout file buffer before executing fork() Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13  7:22 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup properly when an error occurs in CAT test Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13  7:22 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] selftests/resctrl: Commonize the signal handler register/unregister for all tests Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13  7:22 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file Shaopeng Tan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230413072259.2089348-2-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox