From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] selftests/resctrl: Fix set up schemata with 100% allocation on first run in MBM test
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:24:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2536d041-c361-5fb7-84d9-3b158e7fc52e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb65cce8-54d7-68c5-ef19-3364ec95392a@linux.intel.com>
On 4/14/2023 5:31 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2023, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
>
>> There is a comment "Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run"
>
> s/shemata/schemata/
Having the typo may be ok since this is a verbatim (typo and all) copy of
an existing comment.
>> in function mbm_setup(), but there is an increment bug and the condition
>> "num_of_runs == 0" will never be met and write_schemata() will never be
>> called to set schemata to 100%. Even if write_schemata() is called in MBM
>> test, since it is not supported for MBM test it does not set the schemata.
>> This is currently fine because resctrl_val_parm->mum_resctrlfs is always 1
>> and umount/mount will be run in each test to set the schemata to 100%.
>>
>> To support the usage when MBM test does not unmount/remount resctrl
>> filesystem before the test starts, fix to call write_schemata() and
>> set schemata properly when the function is called for the first time.
>>
>> Also, remove static local variable 'num_of_runs' because this is not
>> needed as there is resctrl_val_param->num_of_runs which should be used
>> instead like in cat_setup().
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 13 +++++++------
>> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
>> index c9dfa54af42f..9b591c35310f 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
>> @@ -89,23 +89,24 @@ static int check_results(int span)
>> static int mbm_setup(int num, ...)
>> {
>> struct resctrl_val_param *p;
>> - static int num_of_runs;
>> va_list param;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - /* Run NUM_OF_RUNS times */
>> - if (num_of_runs++ >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
>> - return END_OF_TESTS;
>> -
>> va_start(param, num);
>> p = va_arg(param, struct resctrl_val_param *);
>> va_end(param);
>>
>> + /* Run NUM_OF_RUNS times */
>> + if (p->num_of_runs >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
>> + return -1;
>
> This is not rebased correctly, negative return values mean now errors.
> To complete tests "normally", return END_OF_TESTS. Please see commit
> fa10366cc6f4 ("selftests/resctrl: Allow ->setup() to return errors") for
> future information.
>
> With the forementioned problems fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>
Thanks for catching this. Unfortunately this was just merged so a separate
fix will be needed.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-14 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 7:22 [PATCH v9 0/6] Some improvements of resctrl selftest Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] selftests/resctrl: Fix set up schemata with 100% allocation on first run in MBM test Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-14 12:31 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-14 15:24 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2023-04-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] selftests/resctrl: Return MBA check result and make it to output message Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests/resctrl: Flush stdout file buffer before executing fork() Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup properly when an error occurs in CAT test Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] selftests/resctrl: Commonize the signal handler register/unregister for all tests Shaopeng Tan
2023-04-13 7:22 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file Shaopeng Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2536d041-c361-5fb7-84d9-3b158e7fc52e@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox