* [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub()
@ 2023-12-21 10:38 Richard Fitzgerald
2023-12-21 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function Richard Fitzgerald
2023-12-22 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() David Gow
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fitzgerald @ 2023-12-21 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brendan.higgins, davidgow, rmoar
Cc: linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel, patches,
Richard Fitzgerald
Swap the arguments to typecheck_fn() in kunit_activate_static_stub()
so that real_fn_addr can be either the function itself or a pointer
to that function.
This is useful to simplify redirecting static functions in a module.
Having to pass the actual function meant that it must be exported
from the module. Either making the 'static' and EXPORT_SYMBOL*()
conditional (which makes the code messy), or change it to always
exported (which increases the export namespace and prevents the
compiler inlining a trivial stub function in non-test builds).
With the original definition of kunit_activate_static_stub() the
address of real_fn_addr was passed to typecheck_fn() as the type to
be passed. This meant that if real_fn_addr was a pointer-to-function
it would resolve to a ** instead of a *, giving an error like this:
error: initialization of ‘int (**)(int)’ from incompatible pointer
type ‘int (*)(int)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/typecheck.h:21:25: note: in definition of macro
‘typecheck_fn’
21 | ({ typeof(type) __tmp = function; \
Swapping the arguments to typecheck_fn makes it take the type of a
pointer to the replacement function. Either a function or a pointer
to function can be assigned to that. For example:
static int some_function(int x)
{
/* whatever */
}
int (* some_function_ptr)(int) = some_function;
static int replacement(int x)
{
/* whatever */
}
Then:
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, some_function, replacement);
yields:
typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement), some_function);
and:
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, some_function_ptr, replacement);
yields:
typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement), some_function_ptr);
The two typecheck_fn() then resolve to:
int (*__tmp)(int) = some_function;
and
int (*__tmp)(int) = some_function_ptr;
Both of these are valid. In the first case the compiler inserts
an implicit '&' to take the address of the supplied function, and
in the second case the RHS is already a pointer to the same type.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
---
No changes since V1.
---
include/kunit/static_stub.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/static_stub.h b/include/kunit/static_stub.h
index 85315c80b303..bf940322dfc0 100644
--- a/include/kunit/static_stub.h
+++ b/include/kunit/static_stub.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void __kunit_activate_static_stub(struct kunit *test,
* The redirection can be disabled again with kunit_deactivate_static_stub().
*/
#define kunit_activate_static_stub(test, real_fn_addr, replacement_addr) do { \
- typecheck_fn(typeof(&real_fn_addr), replacement_addr); \
+ typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement_addr), real_fn_addr); \
__kunit_activate_static_stub(test, real_fn_addr, replacement_addr); \
} while (0)
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function
2023-12-21 10:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() Richard Fitzgerald
@ 2023-12-21 10:38 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2023-12-22 8:38 ` David Gow
2023-12-22 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() David Gow
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Fitzgerald @ 2023-12-21 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brendan.higgins, davidgow, rmoar
Cc: linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel, patches,
Richard Fitzgerald
Adds a variant of example_static_stub_test() that shows use of a
pointer-to-function with kunit_activate_static_stub().
A const pointer to the add_one() function is declared. This
pointer-to-function is passed to kunit_activate_static_stub() and
kunit_deactivate_static_stub() instead of passing add_one directly.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
V2: Added comment for add_one_fn_ptr.
---
lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
index 359dbee10201..798924f7cc86 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
@@ -168,6 +168,16 @@ static int subtract_one(int i)
return i - 1;
}
+/*
+ * If the function to be replaced is static within a module it is
+ * useful to export a pointer to that function instead of having
+ * to change the static function to a non-static exported function.
+ *
+ * This pointer simulates a module exporting a pointer to a static
+ * function.
+ */
+static int (* const add_one_fn_ptr)(int i) = add_one;
+
/*
* This test shows the use of static stubs.
*/
@@ -187,6 +197,30 @@ static void example_static_stub_test(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
}
+/*
+ * This test shows the use of static stubs when the function being
+ * replaced is provided as a pointer-to-function instead of the
+ * actual function. This is useful for providing access to static
+ * functions in a module by exporting a pointer to that function
+ * instead of having to change the static function to a non-static
+ * exported function.
+ */
+static void example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* By default, function is not stubbed. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
+
+ /* Replace add_one() with subtract_one(). */
+ kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
+
+ /* add_one() is now replaced. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 0);
+
+ /* Return add_one() to normal. */
+ kunit_deactivate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
+}
+
static const struct example_param {
int value;
} example_params_array[] = {
@@ -259,6 +293,7 @@ static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(example_mark_skipped_test),
KUNIT_CASE(example_all_expect_macros_test),
KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test),
KUNIT_CASE(example_priv_test),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(example_params_test, example_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(example_slow_test),
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function
2023-12-21 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function Richard Fitzgerald
@ 2023-12-22 8:38 ` David Gow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2023-12-22 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Fitzgerald
Cc: brendan.higgins, rmoar, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel,
patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 546 bytes --]
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 18:39, Richard Fitzgerald
<rf@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote:
>
> Adds a variant of example_static_stub_test() that shows use of a
> pointer-to-function with kunit_activate_static_stub().
>
> A const pointer to the add_one() function is declared. This
> pointer-to-function is passed to kunit_activate_static_stub() and
> kunit_deactivate_static_stub() instead of passing add_one directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Thanks,
-- David
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub()
2023-12-21 10:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() Richard Fitzgerald
2023-12-21 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function Richard Fitzgerald
@ 2023-12-22 8:38 ` David Gow
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2023-12-22 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Fitzgerald
Cc: brendan.higgins, rmoar, linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel,
patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3684 bytes --]
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 18:39, Richard Fitzgerald
<rf@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote:
>
> Swap the arguments to typecheck_fn() in kunit_activate_static_stub()
> so that real_fn_addr can be either the function itself or a pointer
> to that function.
>
> This is useful to simplify redirecting static functions in a module.
> Having to pass the actual function meant that it must be exported
> from the module. Either making the 'static' and EXPORT_SYMBOL*()
> conditional (which makes the code messy), or change it to always
> exported (which increases the export namespace and prevents the
> compiler inlining a trivial stub function in non-test builds).
>
> With the original definition of kunit_activate_static_stub() the
> address of real_fn_addr was passed to typecheck_fn() as the type to
> be passed. This meant that if real_fn_addr was a pointer-to-function
> it would resolve to a ** instead of a *, giving an error like this:
>
> error: initialization of ‘int (**)(int)’ from incompatible pointer
> type ‘int (*)(int)’ [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/typecheck.h:21:25: note: in definition of macro
> ‘typecheck_fn’
> 21 | ({ typeof(type) __tmp = function; \
>
> Swapping the arguments to typecheck_fn makes it take the type of a
> pointer to the replacement function. Either a function or a pointer
> to function can be assigned to that. For example:
>
> static int some_function(int x)
> {
> /* whatever */
> }
>
> int (* some_function_ptr)(int) = some_function;
>
> static int replacement(int x)
> {
> /* whatever */
> }
>
> Then:
> kunit_activate_static_stub(test, some_function, replacement);
> yields:
> typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement), some_function);
>
> and:
> kunit_activate_static_stub(test, some_function_ptr, replacement);
> yields:
> typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement), some_function_ptr);
>
> The two typecheck_fn() then resolve to:
>
> int (*__tmp)(int) = some_function;
> and
> int (*__tmp)(int) = some_function_ptr;
>
> Both of these are valid. In the first case the compiler inserts
> an implicit '&' to take the address of the supplied function, and
> in the second case the RHS is already a pointer to the same type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> ---
This makes sense to me.
I was a little worried at first that this might actually be adding a
layer of indirection (which, given we're keying on the pointer,
would've needed to be done carefully), but this is an obvious fix to
me.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> No changes since V1.
> ---
> include/kunit/static_stub.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/static_stub.h b/include/kunit/static_stub.h
> index 85315c80b303..bf940322dfc0 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/static_stub.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/static_stub.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void __kunit_activate_static_stub(struct kunit *test,
> * The redirection can be disabled again with kunit_deactivate_static_stub().
> */
> #define kunit_activate_static_stub(test, real_fn_addr, replacement_addr) do { \
> - typecheck_fn(typeof(&real_fn_addr), replacement_addr); \
> + typecheck_fn(typeof(&replacement_addr), real_fn_addr); \
> __kunit_activate_static_stub(test, real_fn_addr, replacement_addr); \
> } while (0)
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-22 8:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-21 10:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() Richard Fitzgerald
2023-12-21 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function Richard Fitzgerald
2023-12-22 8:38 ` David Gow
2023-12-22 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: Allow passing function pointer to kunit_activate_static_stub() David Gow
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox