Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 29/29] bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
       [not found] <20241220171130.511389-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2024-12-20 17:11 ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-12-20 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Eduard Zingerman, Alexei Starovoitov, Sasha Levin, daniel, andrii,
	martin.lau, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, shuah, leon.hwang,
	yonghong.song, bpf, netdev, linux-kselftest

From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 1a4607ffba35bf2a630aab299e34dd3f6e658d70 ]

Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate
packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call
invalidates packet pointers.

Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes
use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for
global sub-programs, such that the following program could be
rejected:

    int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
    	bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
    	return 0;
    }

    SEC("tc")
    int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
    	int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
    	... make p valid ...
    	tail_call(sk);
    	*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
    	...
    }

The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that
can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with
tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/filter.c                              | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 33125317994e..bbd0c08072cb 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -7934,6 +7934,8 @@ bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 	case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_head:
 	case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_meta:
 	case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_tail:
+	/* tail-called program could call any of the above */
+	case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
 		return true;
 	default:
 		return false;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
index 8a0632c37839..79f5087dade2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ int subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	int ret = 1;
 
 	__sink(ret);
+	/* let verifier know that 'subprog_tc' can change pointers to skb->data */
+	bpf_skb_change_proto(skb, 0, 0);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-12-20 17:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20241220171130.511389-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2024-12-20 17:11 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 29/29] bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox