From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com, willemb@google.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: report output format as TAP 13 in Python tests
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 10:50:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250302105059.5f35fc3b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f196026-02ec-4db0-90b0-10c1e720c345@kernel.org>
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:52:06 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 28/02/2025 19:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > The Python lib based tests report that they are producing
> > "KTAP version 1", but really we aren't making use of any
> > KTAP features, like subtests. Our output is plain TAP.
> >
> > Report TAP 13 instead of KTAP 1, this is what mptcp tests do,
>
> Indeed, and also TC tests, and all the ones using kselftest_harness.h I
> think.
>
> > and what NIPA knows how to parse best. For HW testing we need
> > precise subtest result tracking.
>
> I guess the best would be to have the kselftests infrastructure fully
> supporting KTAP, and then have a way for each test to print subtests
> correctly, not nested in the comments like it is done for the moment.
> But that looks harder to put in place, and the current solution is used
> in a few areas.
Right. So for additional context for folks less familiar with selftests
the two minor inconveniences which made "supporting KTAP" a less
exciting option are: (a) we run make run_tests which wraps things
in an outer TAP, so we'd end up with a hybrid, anyway; (b) NIPA
only supports one level of subtests.
Thanks for the review!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-02 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 18:00 [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: report output format as TAP 13 in Python tests Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-01 10:52 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-03-02 18:50 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-03 23:36 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250302105059.5f35fc3b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox