Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>, Tengda Wu <wutengda2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/8] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to softirq
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 12:28:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260102122807.7025fc87@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260101163417.1065705-2-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>

On Thu,  1 Jan 2026 11:34:10 -0500
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> wrote:

>  trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
>  trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
>  trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
>  raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
>  rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
>  unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
>  __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
>  arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
>  stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
>  __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
>  trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
>  trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
>  trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
>  raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
>  rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
>  unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
>  __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
>  arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
>  stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
>  __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180

Stacktrace should have recursion protection too.

Can you try this patch to see if it would have fixed the problem too?

-- Steve

diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
index ae04054a1be3..e6ca052b2a85 100644
--- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
+++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ enum {
 	TRACE_INTERNAL_SIRQ_BIT,
 	TRACE_INTERNAL_TRANSITION_BIT,
 
+	/* Internal event use recursion bits */
+	TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_BIT,
+	TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_NMI_BIT,
+	TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_IRQ_BIT,
+	TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_SIRQ_BIT,
+	TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_TRANSITION_BIT,
+
 	TRACE_BRANCH_BIT,
 /*
  * Abuse of the trace_recursion.
@@ -58,6 +65,8 @@ enum {
 
 #define TRACE_LIST_START	TRACE_INTERNAL_BIT
 
+#define TRACE_EVENT_START	TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_BIT
+
 #define TRACE_CONTEXT_MASK	((1 << (TRACE_LIST_START + TRACE_CONTEXT_BITS)) - 1)
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 2d387d56dcd4..e145d1c7f604 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3013,6 +3013,11 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,
 	struct ftrace_stack *fstack;
 	struct stack_entry *entry;
 	int stackidx;
+	int bit;
+
+	bit = trace_test_and_set_recursion(_THIS_IP_, _RET_IP_, TRACE_EVENT_START);
+	if (bit < 0)
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * Add one, for this function and the call to save_stack_trace()
@@ -3081,6 +3086,7 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,
 	/* Again, don't let gcc optimize things here */
 	barrier();
 	__this_cpu_dec(ftrace_stack_reserve);
+	trace_clear_recursion(bit);
 }
 
 static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-02 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-01 16:34 [PATCH -next 0/8] RCU updates from me for next merge window Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 1/8] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to softirq Joel Fernandes
2026-01-02 17:28   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-01-02 17:30     ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-02 19:51       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-03  0:41         ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-04  3:20           ` Yao Kai
2026-01-05 17:16             ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-09 16:38               ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-04 10:00           ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-07 23:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-08  1:02     ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08  1:35       ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08  3:35         ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 15:39           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-08 15:57             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-01-08 15:25       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09  1:12         ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 14:23           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 2/8] srcu: Use suitable gfp_flags for the init_srcu_struct_nodes() Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 3/8] rcu/nocb: Remove unnecessary WakeOvfIsDeferred wake path Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 15:57   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09  1:39     ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 10:32       ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-09 11:20         ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-11 12:14           ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 4/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning if no rcuog wake up attempt happened during overload Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 17:22   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09  3:49     ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 14:36       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 21:20         ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 5/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning to detect if overload advancement is ever useful Joel Fernandes
2026-01-14  1:09   ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 6/8] rcu: Reduce synchronize_rcu() latency by reporting GP kthread's CPU QS early Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 7/8] rcutorture: Prevent concurrent kvm.sh runs on same source tree Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 8/8] rcutorture: Add --kill-previous option to terminate previous kvm.sh runs Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 22:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-04 10:55 ` [PATCH -next 0/8] RCU updates from me for next merge window Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260102122807.7025fc87@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=wutengda2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yaokai34@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox