From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>, Tengda Wu <wutengda2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/8] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to softirq
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 12:28:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260102122807.7025fc87@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260101163417.1065705-2-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 11:34:10 -0500
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> wrote:
> trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
> trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
> trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
> raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
> rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
> unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
> __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
> arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
> stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
> __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
> trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x6d/0x220
> trace_event_buffer_commit+0x5c/0x260
> trace_event_raw_event_softirq+0x47/0x80
> raise_softirq_irqoff+0x6e/0xa0
> rcu_read_unlock_special+0xb1/0x160
> unwind_next_frame+0x203/0x9b0
> __unwind_start+0x15d/0x1c0
> arch_stack_walk+0x62/0xf0
> stack_trace_save+0x48/0x70
> __ftrace_trace_stack.constprop.0+0x144/0x180
Stacktrace should have recursion protection too.
Can you try this patch to see if it would have fixed the problem too?
-- Steve
diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
index ae04054a1be3..e6ca052b2a85 100644
--- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
+++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ enum {
TRACE_INTERNAL_SIRQ_BIT,
TRACE_INTERNAL_TRANSITION_BIT,
+ /* Internal event use recursion bits */
+ TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_BIT,
+ TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_NMI_BIT,
+ TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_IRQ_BIT,
+ TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_SIRQ_BIT,
+ TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_TRANSITION_BIT,
+
TRACE_BRANCH_BIT,
/*
* Abuse of the trace_recursion.
@@ -58,6 +65,8 @@ enum {
#define TRACE_LIST_START TRACE_INTERNAL_BIT
+#define TRACE_EVENT_START TRACE_INTERNAL_EVENT_BIT
+
#define TRACE_CONTEXT_MASK ((1 << (TRACE_LIST_START + TRACE_CONTEXT_BITS)) - 1)
/*
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 2d387d56dcd4..e145d1c7f604 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3013,6 +3013,11 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,
struct ftrace_stack *fstack;
struct stack_entry *entry;
int stackidx;
+ int bit;
+
+ bit = trace_test_and_set_recursion(_THIS_IP_, _RET_IP_, TRACE_EVENT_START);
+ if (bit < 0)
+ return;
/*
* Add one, for this function and the call to save_stack_trace()
@@ -3081,6 +3086,7 @@ static void __ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,
/* Again, don't let gcc optimize things here */
barrier();
__this_cpu_dec(ftrace_stack_reserve);
+ trace_clear_recursion(bit);
}
static inline void ftrace_trace_stack(struct trace_array *tr,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-02 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-01 16:34 [PATCH -next 0/8] RCU updates from me for next merge window Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 1/8] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to softirq Joel Fernandes
2026-01-02 17:28 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-01-02 17:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-02 19:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-03 0:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-04 3:20 ` Yao Kai
2026-01-05 17:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-09 16:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-04 10:00 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-07 23:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-08 1:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 1:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 3:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 15:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-08 15:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-01-08 15:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 1:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 14:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 2/8] srcu: Use suitable gfp_flags for the init_srcu_struct_nodes() Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 3/8] rcu/nocb: Remove unnecessary WakeOvfIsDeferred wake path Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 1:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 10:32 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-09 11:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-11 12:14 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 4/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning if no rcuog wake up attempt happened during overload Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 17:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 3:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 21:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 5/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning to detect if overload advancement is ever useful Joel Fernandes
2026-01-14 1:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 6/8] rcu: Reduce synchronize_rcu() latency by reporting GP kthread's CPU QS early Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 7/8] rcutorture: Prevent concurrent kvm.sh runs on same source tree Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 8/8] rcutorture: Add --kill-previous option to terminate previous kvm.sh runs Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-04 10:55 ` [PATCH -next 0/8] RCU updates from me for next merge window Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260102122807.7025fc87@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=wutengda2@huawei.com \
--cc=yaokai34@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox