From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 4/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning if no rcuog wake up attempt happened during overload
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 18:22:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aV_n5RqNbikyN90u@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260101163417.1065705-5-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Le Thu, Jan 01, 2026 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Joel Fernandes a écrit :
> To be sure we have no rcog wake ups that were lost, add a warning
> to cover the case where the rdp is overloaded with callbacks but
> no wake up was attempted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++++
> kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 6 +++++-
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 293bbd9ac3f4..78c045a5ef03 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3767,6 +3767,10 @@ static void rcu_barrier_entrain(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> debug_rcu_head_unqueue(&rdp->barrier_head);
> rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("IRQNQ"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
> + if (wake_nocb)
> + rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt = true;
> +#endif
entrain only queues a callback if the list is non-empty. And if it's
non-empty, rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt should be true already.
> rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
> if (wake_nocb)
> wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 653fb4ba5852..74bd6a2a2f84 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
> unsigned long nocb_gp_loops; /* # passes through wait code. */
> struct swait_queue_head nocb_gp_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
> bool nocb_cb_sleep; /* Is the nocb CB thread asleep? */
> + bool nocb_gp_wake_attempt; /* Was a rcuog wakeup attempted? */
How about nocb_gp_handling ?
> struct task_struct *nocb_cb_kthread;
> struct list_head nocb_head_rdp; /*
> * Head of rcu_data list in wakeup chain,
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index daff2756cd90..7e9d465c8ab1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
> lazy_len = READ_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len);
> if (was_alldone) {
> rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = len;
> + rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt = true;
> rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
> // Only lazy CBs in bypass list
> if (lazy_len && bypass_len == lazy_len) {
> @@ -563,7 +564,8 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
>
> return;
> } else if (len > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark) {
> - /* ... or if many callbacks queued. */
> + /* Callback overload condition. */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt);
> rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = len;
> j = jiffies;
> if (j != rdp->nocb_gp_adv_time &&
> @@ -688,6 +690,7 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> bypass_ncbs > 2 * qhimark)) {
> flush_bypass = true;
> } else if (!bypass_ncbs && rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist)) {
> + rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt = false;
This is when nocb_cb_wait() is done with callbacks but nocb_gp_wait() is done
with them sooner, when the grace period is done for all pending callbacks.
Something like this would perhaps be more accurate:
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index e6cd56603cad..52010cbeaa76 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -746,6 +746,8 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
needwait_gp = true;
trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu,
TPS("NeedWaitGP"));
+ } else if (!rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass)) {
+ rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt = false;
}
if (rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
needwake = rdp->nocb_cb_sleep;
> rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> continue; /* No callbacks here, try next. */
> }
> @@ -1254,6 +1257,7 @@ lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
> continue;
> }
> rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass(rdp, jiffies);
> + rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt = true;
Same here, we should expect rdp->nocb_gp_wake_attempt to be already on since
there are lazy callbacks. That's a good opportunity to test the related assertion
though.
Thanks.
> rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> sc->nr_to_scan -= _count;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-01 16:34 [PATCH -next 0/8] RCU updates from me for next merge window Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 1/8] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to softirq Joel Fernandes
2026-01-02 17:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-02 17:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-02 19:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-03 0:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-04 3:20 ` Yao Kai
2026-01-05 17:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-09 16:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-01-04 10:00 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-07 23:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-08 1:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 1:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 3:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 15:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-08 15:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-01-08 15:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 1:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 14:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 2/8] srcu: Use suitable gfp_flags for the init_srcu_struct_nodes() Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 3/8] rcu/nocb: Remove unnecessary WakeOvfIsDeferred wake path Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 1:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 10:32 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-09 11:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-11 12:14 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 4/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning if no rcuog wake up attempt happened during overload Joel Fernandes
2026-01-08 17:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-01-09 3:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-09 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-09 21:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 5/8] rcu/nocb: Add warning to detect if overload advancement is ever useful Joel Fernandes
2026-01-14 1:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 6/8] rcu: Reduce synchronize_rcu() latency by reporting GP kthread's CPU QS early Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 7/8] rcutorture: Prevent concurrent kvm.sh runs on same source tree Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 16:34 ` [PATCH -next 8/8] rcutorture: Add --kill-previous option to terminate previous kvm.sh runs Joel Fernandes
2026-01-01 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-04 10:55 ` [PATCH -next 0/8] RCU updates from me for next merge window Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aV_n5RqNbikyN90u@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox