From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] perf/arm64: Add BRBE support for bpf_get_branch_snapshot()
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:57:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260413185740.3286146-4-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260413185740.3286146-1-puranjay@kernel.org>
Enable bpf_get_branch_snapshot() on ARM64 by implementing the
perf_snapshot_branch_stack static call for BRBE.
BRBE is paused before masking exceptions to avoid branch buffer
pollution from trace_hardirqs_off(). Exceptions are then masked with
local_daif_save() to prevent PMU overflow pseudo-NMIs from interfering.
If an overflow between pause and DAIF save re-enables BRBE, the snapshot
detects this via BRBFCR_EL1.PAUSED and bails out.
Branch records are read using perf_entry_from_brbe_regset() with a NULL
event pointer to bypass event-specific filtering. The buffer is
invalidated after reading.
Introduce a for_each_brbe_entry() iterator to deduplicate bank
iteration between brbe_read_filtered_entries() and the snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.h | 9 ++++
drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c | 5 +-
3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
index ba554e0c846c..fd62019ddc83 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
+#include <asm/daifflags.h>
#include "arm_brbe.h"
#define BRBFCR_EL1_BRANCH_FILTERS (BRBFCR_EL1_DIRECT | \
@@ -271,6 +272,20 @@ static void select_brbe_bank(int bank)
isb();
}
+static inline void __brbe_advance(int *bank, int *idx, int nr_hw)
+{
+ if (++(*idx) >= BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES &&
+ *bank * BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES + *idx < nr_hw) {
+ *idx = 0;
+ select_brbe_bank(++(*bank));
+ }
+}
+
+#define for_each_brbe_entry(idx, nr_hw) \
+ for (int __bank = (select_brbe_bank(0), 0), idx = 0; \
+ __bank * BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES + idx < (nr_hw); \
+ __brbe_advance(&__bank, &idx, (nr_hw)))
+
static bool __read_brbe_regset(struct brbe_regset *entry, int idx)
{
entry->brbinf = get_brbinf_reg(idx);
@@ -618,10 +633,10 @@ static bool perf_entry_from_brbe_regset(int index, struct perf_branch_entry *ent
brbe_set_perf_entry_type(entry, brbinf);
- if (!branch_sample_no_cycles(event))
+ if (!event || !branch_sample_no_cycles(event))
entry->cycles = brbinf_get_cycles(brbinf);
- if (!branch_sample_no_flags(event)) {
+ if (!event || !branch_sample_no_flags(event)) {
/* Mispredict info is available for source only and complete branch records. */
if (!brbe_record_is_target_only(brbinf)) {
entry->mispred = brbinf_get_mispredict(brbinf);
@@ -774,32 +789,90 @@ void brbe_read_filtered_entries(struct perf_branch_stack *branch_stack,
{
struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
int nr_hw = brbe_num_branch_records(cpu_pmu);
- int nr_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_hw, BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES);
int nr_filtered = 0;
u64 branch_sample_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
DECLARE_BITMAP(event_type_mask, PERF_BR_ARM64_MAX);
prepare_event_branch_type_mask(branch_sample_type, event_type_mask);
- for (int bank = 0; bank < nr_banks; bank++) {
- int nr_remaining = nr_hw - (bank * BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES);
- int nr_this_bank = min(nr_remaining, BRBE_BANK_MAX_ENTRIES);
+ for_each_brbe_entry(i, nr_hw) {
+ struct perf_branch_entry *pbe = &branch_stack->entries[nr_filtered];
- select_brbe_bank(bank);
+ if (!perf_entry_from_brbe_regset(i, pbe, event))
+ break;
- for (int i = 0; i < nr_this_bank; i++) {
- struct perf_branch_entry *pbe = &branch_stack->entries[nr_filtered];
+ if (!filter_branch_record(pbe, branch_sample_type, event_type_mask))
+ continue;
- if (!perf_entry_from_brbe_regset(i, pbe, event))
- goto done;
+ nr_filtered++;
+ }
- if (!filter_branch_record(pbe, branch_sample_type, event_type_mask))
- continue;
+ branch_stack->nr = nr_filtered;
+}
- nr_filtered++;
- }
+/*
+ * Best-effort BRBE snapshot for BPF tracing. Pause BRBE to avoid
+ * self-recording and return 0 if the snapshot state appears disturbed.
+ */
+int arm_brbe_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries, unsigned int cnt)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int nr_hw, nr_copied = 0;
+ u64 brbfcr, brbcr;
+
+ if (!cnt)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Pause BRBE first to avoid recording our own branches. The
+ * sysreg read/write and ISB are branchless, so pausing before
+ * checking BRBCR avoids polluting the buffer with our own
+ * conditional branches.
+ */
+ brbfcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ brbcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr | BRBFCR_EL1_PAUSED, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+
+ /* Bail out if BRBE is not enabled (BRBCR_EL1 == 0). */
+ if (!brbcr) {
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ return 0;
}
-done:
- branch_stack->nr = nr_filtered;
+ /* Block local exception delivery while reading the buffer. */
+ flags = local_daif_save();
+
+ /*
+ * A PMU overflow before local_daif_save() could have re-enabled
+ * BRBE, clearing the PAUSED bit. The overflow handler already
+ * restored BRBE to its correct state, so just bail out.
+ */
+ if (!(read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBFCR_EL1) & BRBFCR_EL1_PAUSED)) {
+ local_daif_restore(flags);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ nr_hw = FIELD_GET(BRBIDR0_EL1_NUMREC_MASK,
+ read_sysreg_s(SYS_BRBIDR0_EL1));
+
+ for_each_brbe_entry(i, nr_hw) {
+ if (nr_copied >= cnt)
+ break;
+
+ if (!perf_entry_from_brbe_regset(i, &entries[nr_copied], NULL))
+ break;
+
+ nr_copied++;
+ }
+
+ brbe_invalidate();
+
+ /* Restore BRBCR before unpausing via BRBFCR, matching brbe_enable(). */
+ write_sysreg_s(brbcr, SYS_BRBCR_EL1);
+ isb();
+ write_sysreg_s(brbfcr, SYS_BRBFCR_EL1);
+ local_daif_restore(flags);
+
+ return nr_copied;
}
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.h b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.h
index b7c7d8796c86..c2a1824437fb 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.h
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
struct arm_pmu;
struct perf_branch_stack;
struct perf_event;
+struct perf_branch_entry;
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE
void brbe_probe(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu);
@@ -22,6 +23,8 @@ void brbe_disable(void);
bool brbe_branch_attr_valid(struct perf_event *event);
void brbe_read_filtered_entries(struct perf_branch_stack *branch_stack,
const struct perf_event *event);
+int arm_brbe_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries,
+ unsigned int cnt);
#else
static inline void brbe_probe(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) { }
static inline unsigned int brbe_num_branch_records(const struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
@@ -44,4 +47,10 @@ static void brbe_read_filtered_entries(struct perf_branch_stack *branch_stack,
const struct perf_event *event)
{
}
+
+static inline int arm_brbe_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries,
+ unsigned int cnt)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
index 8014ff766cff..1a9f129a0f94 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
@@ -1449,8 +1449,11 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, char *name,
cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv8pmu_set_event_filter;
cpu_pmu->pmu.event_idx = armv8pmu_user_event_idx;
- if (brbe_num_branch_records(cpu_pmu))
+ if (brbe_num_branch_records(cpu_pmu)) {
cpu_pmu->pmu.sched_task = armv8pmu_sched_task;
+ static_call_update(perf_snapshot_branch_stack,
+ arm_brbe_snapshot_branch_stack);
+ }
cpu_pmu->name = name;
cpu_pmu->map_event = map_event;
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 18:57 [PATCH v3 0/4] arm64: Add BRBE support for bpf_get_branch_snapshot() Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf/core: Fix NULL pmu_ctx passed to PMU sched_task callback Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf: Use a union to clear branch entry bitfields Puranjay Mohan
2026-04-13 18:57 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-04-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/bpf: Adjust wasted entries threshold for ARM64 BRBE Puranjay Mohan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260413185740.3286146-4-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox