From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: david@ixit.cz
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
bongsu.jeon@samsung.com, shuah@kernel.org,
oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH nfc] selftests/nci: increase t4t_tag_read timeout for debug kernels
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 15:16:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807221622.1727540-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
The t4t_tag_read test occasionally exceeds the default 30-second
TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT, triggering flaky "Test terminated by timeout"
failures (~4% rate on slow CI systems with debug configs).
TBH this is potentially papering over a real issue. The test usually
takes 7sec to finish, with this fix it sometimes takes 37s. What
happens when it needs extra time I do not know. But the upshot is
that it used to flake 4% of the time in NIPA and now it passes
(200 clean runs). So unless someone has time to really dig into this,
let's silence it?
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: bongsu.jeon@samsung.com
CC: david@ixit.cz
CC: shuah@kernel.org
CC: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev
CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
index 312f84ee0444..77344227dd7f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ int disconnect_tag(int nfc_sock, int virtual_fd)
return status;
}
-TEST_F(NCI, t4t_tag_read)
+TEST_F_TIMEOUT(NCI, t4t_tag_read, 120)
{
int nfc_sock;
int status;
--
2.55.0
reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807221622.1727540-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox