Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: expose CPU prefetch and cache modulation controls
@ 2026-08-17  2:23 KobaK
  2026-08-17  2:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: add CPU prefetch and cache modulation sysfs interface KobaK
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: KobaK @ 2026-08-17  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc,
	linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, Fenghua Yu, Tushar Dave,
	Kai-Heng Feng, rupakr, mohammedk

From: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>

This series adds CONFIG_ARM64_CPUMOD, a default-off arm64 interface for
controlled performance characterization of selected implementation-defined
CPU prefetch and cache-management fields. It exposes a small set of named,
per-CPU attributes under the path below, with writable control fields
range-checked before register state is changed:

  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/cpumod/

The directory is created for online CPUs whose MIDR matches a recognized
Grace or Vera profile, with common and profile-specific attributes selected
for that CPU. Register accesses execute on the CPU that owns the sysfs
instance, and CPU hotplug creates or removes the per-CPU subtree as the CPU
transitions online or offline. Unsupported CPU profiles are skipped without
blocking module load or CPU hotplug.

The implementation keeps each dynamically allocated kobject in a private
per-CPU pointer, avoiding use of the CPU device's shared driver-data slot.
The documentation defines the ABI, firmware prerequisite, and hotplug
lifecycle. The kselftest validates profile-specific layout, unsupported-CPU
skipping, decimal affected_cpus reporting, value validation, optional
writes, all-online-CPU coverage, and cleanup.

The controls require firmware to permit EL1 access to the relevant
implementation control registers. This is an RFC interface for controlled
evaluation, not a general raw-register or production-default tuning ABI.

Compile and static verification passed. DUT runtime validation was not run.

Koba Ko (3):
  arm64: add CPU prefetch and cache modulation sysfs interface
  Documentation/arch/arm64: document arm_cpumod
  selftests: arm64: add arm_cpumod kselftest

 Documentation/arch/arm64/arm-cpumod.rst       |  89 +++
 Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst            |   1 +
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  17 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile                    |   1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/arm_cpumod.c                | 471 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/arm_cpumod_internal.h       | 113 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile        |   2 +-
 .../selftests/arm64/arm_cpumod/Makefile       |   5 +
 .../selftests/arm64/arm_cpumod/arm_cpumod.sh  | 526 ++++++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 1224 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/arch/arm64/arm-cpumod.rst
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/arm_cpumod.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/arm_cpumod_internal.h
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/arm_cpumod/Makefile
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/arm_cpumod/arm_cpumod.sh

-- 
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-17  2:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-17  2:23 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: expose CPU prefetch and cache modulation controls KobaK
2026-08-17  2:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: add CPU prefetch and cache modulation sysfs interface KobaK
2026-08-17  2:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] Documentation/arch/arm64: document arm_cpumod KobaK
2026-08-17  2:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftests: arm64: add arm_cpumod kselftest KobaK

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox