* [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix the wrong format specifier
@ 2024-07-26 2:32 Zhu Jun
2024-07-26 8:30 ` [PATCH v5] tools/testing: Fix " Markus Elfring
2024-07-26 17:32 ` [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix " Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Jun @ 2024-07-26 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhang.lyra; +Cc: shuah, kees, luto, wad, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, zhujun2
The format specifier in fprintf is "%u", that "%u" should use
unsigned int type instead.the problem is discovered by reading code.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
v1->v2:
modify commit info add how to find the problem in the log
v2->v3:
Seems this can use macro WTERMSIG like those above usage, rather than
changing the print format.
v3->v4:
Now the commit summary doesn't match the change you are making.
Also WTERMSIG() is incorrect for this conditional code path.
See comments below in the code path.
I would leave the v2 code intact. How are you testing this change?
Please include the details in the change log.
v4->v5:
Compile the kernel for testing using make
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
index e05ac8261046..675b8f43e148 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ void __wait_for_test(struct __test_metadata *t)
.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO,
};
struct sigaction saved_action;
- int status;
+ unsigned int status;
if (sigaction(SIGALRM, &action, &saved_action)) {
t->passed = 0;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5] tools/testing: Fix the wrong format specifier
2024-07-26 2:32 [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix the wrong format specifier Zhu Jun
@ 2024-07-26 8:30 ` Markus Elfring
2024-07-26 17:32 ` [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix " Shuah Khan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2024-07-26 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Jun, linux-kselftest, Chunyan Zhang
Cc: LKML, Andy Lutomirski, Kees Cook, Shuah Khan, Will Drewry
> The format specifier in fprintf is "%u", that "%u" should use
> unsigned int type instead.
* Please improve the change description with imperative wordings.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10#n94
* Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10#n145
* How good does the summary phrase fit to your proposal?
> the problem is discovered by reading code.
How do you think about to detect such change possibilities by more systematic
source code analyses?
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix the wrong format specifier
2024-07-26 2:32 [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix the wrong format specifier Zhu Jun
2024-07-26 8:30 ` [PATCH v5] tools/testing: Fix " Markus Elfring
@ 2024-07-26 17:32 ` Shuah Khan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-07-26 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhu Jun, zhang.lyra
Cc: shuah, kees, luto, wad, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Shuah Khan
On 7/25/24 20:32, Zhu Jun wrote:
> The format specifier in fprintf is "%u", that "%u" should use
> unsigned int type instead.the problem is discovered by reading code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> modify commit info add how to find the problem in the log
> v2->v3:
> Seems this can use macro WTERMSIG like those above usage, rather than
> changing the print format.
> v3->v4:
> Now the commit summary doesn't match the change you are making.
> Also WTERMSIG() is incorrect for this conditional code path.
> See comments below in the code path.
>
> I would leave the v2 code intact. How are you testing this change?
> Please include the details in the change log.
I am asking you to send the v2 change with updated change log
to show how this change is tested.
> v4->v5:
> Compile the kernel for testing using make
Running make isn't sufficient - please verify running the tests
making sure there are no regressions. Since you are changing the
harness, you want to make sure this change You are changing the
harness.
>
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
> index e05ac8261046..675b8f43e148 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
> @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ void __wait_for_test(struct __test_metadata *t)
> .sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO,
> };
> struct sigaction saved_action;
> - int status;
> + unsigned int status;
I am asking you to send the v2 change with updated change log
to show how this change is tested.
fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM,
- "# %s: Test ended in some other way [%u]\n",
+ "# %s: Test ended in some other way [%d]\n",
t->name,
%d makes sense here in this message.
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-26 17:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-26 2:32 [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix the wrong format specifier Zhu Jun
2024-07-26 8:30 ` [PATCH v5] tools/testing: Fix " Markus Elfring
2024-07-26 17:32 ` [PATCH v5] tools/testing:Fix " Shuah Khan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox