From: R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: hbathini@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
venkat88@linux.ibm.com, yeswanth@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 22:02:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418fbfa0-9e0a-4bf9-927d-cfd5b08aa087@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0700c866205c8fa2f861e4b8d64fdf7469cba021.1788154635.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
On 31.08.2026 12:46 PM, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Ensure the dummy trampoline address field present between the OOL stub
> and the long branch stub is 4/8-byte aligned, for memory compatibility
> when content loaded to a register.
>
> Reported-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: d243b62b7bd3 ("powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf trampolines")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
System: ppc64le LPAR (IBM POWER), Linux 7.3-rc2
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 7 +++---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 7 +++---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 7 +++---
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 6d58df361648..4da8bde92e1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -227,10 +227,11 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *
> int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx,
> u32 *addrs, int pass, bool extra_pass);
> void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> -void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> -void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> +void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> +void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx);
> void bpf_jit_realloc_regs(struct codegen_context *ctx);
> -int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr);
> +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
> + long exit_addr);
> void prepare_for_fsession_fentry(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int cookie_cnt,
> int cookie_off, int retval_off);
> void store_func_meta(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func_meta, int func_meta_off);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 11981d2270a9..8ca36a933c7a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -49,11 +49,35 @@ asm (
> " .popsection ;"
> );
>
> -void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> +void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> int ool_stub_idx, long_branch_stub_idx;
> + int ool_stub_sz;
>
> /*
> + * Align the mis-aligned dummy_tramp_addr field in the fimage.
> + * The alignment NOP must appear before OOL stub, to make
> + * ool_stub_idx & long_branch_stub_idx constant from end.
> + *
> + * The fimage can be non 8-byte aligned, so final alignment depends
> + * on start of fimage and the stub's instruction count offset. The
> + * OOL stub size is 4 instructions (with CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE)
> + * or 3 instructions (without) before dummy_tramp_addr.
> + *
> + * Emit a NOP here if address is not SZL aligned.
> + *
> + * In pass=0 when image==NULL, conservatively account for space
> + * required to accommodate alignment NOP. In case final pass skips
> + * emitting alignment NOP, the image buffer have 4 spare bytes and
> + * jited_len signifies correct program size.
> + */
> +
> + ool_stub_sz = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE) ? 16 : 12;
> + if (!image || !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)fimage + ctx->idx*4 + ool_stub_sz, SZL))
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
> +
> + /*
> + * nop // optional, for alignment of dummy_tramp_addr
> * Out-of-line stub:
> * mflr r0
> * [b|bl] tramp
> @@ -70,7 +94,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>
> /*
> * Long branch stub:
> - * .long <dummy_tramp_addr>
> + * .long <dummy_tramp_addr> // 8-byte aligned
> * mflr r11
> * bcl 20,31,$+4
> * mflr r12
> @@ -81,6 +105,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> */
> if (image)
> *((unsigned long *)&image[ctx->idx]) = (unsigned long)dummy_tramp;
> +
> ctx->idx += SZL / 4;
> long_branch_stub_idx = ctx->idx;
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R11));
> @@ -97,7 +122,8 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> }
> }
>
> -int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr)
> +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx,
> + int tmp_reg, long exit_addr)
> {
> if (exit_addr && is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (long)(ctx->idx * 4))) {
> PPC_JMP(exit_addr);
> @@ -106,7 +132,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
> PPC_JMP(ctx->alt_exit_addr);
> } else {
> ctx->alt_exit_addr = ctx->idx * 4;
> - bpf_jit_build_epilogue(image, ctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(image, fimage, ctx);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -286,7 +312,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr
> */
> bpf_jit_build_prologue(NULL, &cgctx);
> addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4;
> - bpf_jit_build_epilogue(NULL, &cgctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(NULL, NULL, &cgctx);
>
> fixup_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4;
> extable_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * sizeof(struct exception_table_entry);
> @@ -322,7 +348,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr
> goto out_err;
> }
> addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4;
> - bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, &cgctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, fcode_base, &cgctx);
>
> proglen = cgctx.idx * 4;
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index bfdc50740da8..f5b9441cf46a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
>
> }
>
> -void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> +void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0)));
>
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR());
>
> - bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, ctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, fimage, ctx);
> }
>
> /* Relative offset needs to be calculated based on final image location */
> @@ -1149,7 +1149,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> * we'll just fall through to the epilogue.
> */
> if (i != flen - 1) {
> - ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, _R0, exit_addr);
> + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, fimage,
> + ctx, _R0, exit_addr);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 59302cabc466..e80312171aa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
> }
> }
>
> -void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> +void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx);
>
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
>
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR());
>
> - bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, ctx);
> + bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, fimage, ctx);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1737,7 +1737,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> * we'll just fall through to the epilogue.
> */
> if (i != flen - 1) {
> - ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, tmp1_reg, exit_addr);
> + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, fimage, ctx,
> + tmp1_reg, exit_addr);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
--
Thanks and Regards
R.Nageswara Sastry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 7:15 [PATCH v13 0/8] powerpc/bpf: address missing verifier selftest coverage Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 7:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:30 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:15 ` [PATCH v13 2/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix percpu private stack leak on JIT failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:31 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 3/8] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 8:48 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:31 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 4/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 8:23 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 8:35 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:32 ` R Nageswara Sastry [this message]
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 5/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 8:46 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:32 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix powerpc JIT disassembly failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 7/8] selftests/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tailcall " Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418fbfa0-9e0a-4bf9-927d-cfd5b08aa087@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yeswanth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).