From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
venkat88@linux.ibm.com, yeswanth@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 14:16:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f072a9a-c656-4f79-a805-f90dee35bfde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <647e37d4e0049cc9c9a6977ac112a445f6ced6c8.1788154635.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
On 31/08/26 12:46 pm, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Move the long branch address field to the bottom of the long
> branch stub. This allows uninterrupted disassembly until the
> last 4/8 bytes. The last bytes exclusion is logically necessary to
> prevent disassembly failure, otherwise the actual program layout
> is never altered. Hence no effect on overall program size.
> Also, align dummy_tramp_addr field with 8-byte boundary.
>
> Following is disassembler output for test program with moved down
> dummy_tramp_addr field:
> .....
> .....
> pc:68 left:44 a6 03 08 7c : mtlr 0
> pc:72 left:40 bc ff ff 4b : b .-68
> pc:76 left:36 a6 02 68 7d : mflr 11
> pc:80 left:32 05 00 9f 42 : bcl 20, 31, .+4
> pc:84 left:28 a6 02 88 7d : mflr 12
> pc:88 left:24 14 00 8c e9 : ld 12, 20(12)
> pc:92 left:20 a6 03 89 7d : mtctr 12
> pc:96 left:16 a6 03 68 7d : mtlr 11
> pc:100 left:12 20 04 80 4e : bctr
> pc:104 left:8 c0 34 1d 00 :
>
> Failure log:
> Can't disasm instruction at offset 104: c0 34 1d 00 00 00 00 c0
> Disassembly logic can truncate at 104, ignoring last 8 bytes.
>
> Update the dummy_tramp_addr field offset calculation from the end
> of the program to reflect its new location, for bpf_arch_text_poke()
> to update the actual trampoline's address in this field.
>
> All BPF trampoline selftests continue to pass with this patch applied.
>
This makes it easy to disassemble the bpf programs. Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 8ca36a933c7a..c2717f0d9cdd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -52,19 +52,19 @@ asm (
> void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> int ool_stub_idx, long_branch_stub_idx;
> - int ool_stub_sz;
> + int stub_sz;
>
> /*
> + * The dummy_tramp_addr field is placed at bottom of Long branch stub.
> * Align the mis-aligned dummy_tramp_addr field in the fimage.
> * The alignment NOP must appear before OOL stub, to make
> * ool_stub_idx & long_branch_stub_idx constant from end.
> *
> * The fimage can be non 8-byte aligned, so final alignment depends
> - * on start of fimage and the stub's instruction count offset. The
> - * OOL stub size is 4 instructions (with CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE)
> - * or 3 instructions (without) before dummy_tramp_addr.
> - *
> - * Emit a NOP here if address is not SZL aligned.
> + * on start of fimage and the stub's instruction count. The
> + * stubs block has 11 instructions (with CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE)
> + * or 10 instructions (without) before dummy_tramp_addr field. Emit a
> + * NOP if the address of dummy_tramp_addr is non aligned.
> *
> * In pass=0 when image==NULL, conservatively account for space
> * required to accommodate alignment NOP. In case final pass skips
> @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context
> * jited_len signifies correct program size.
> */
>
> - ool_stub_sz = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE) ? 16 : 12;
> - if (!image || !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)fimage + ctx->idx*4 + ool_stub_sz, SZL))
> + stub_sz = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE) ? 44 : 40;
> + if (!image || !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)fimage + ctx->idx*4 + stub_sz, SZL))
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
>
> /*
> @@ -94,28 +94,29 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context
>
> /*
> * Long branch stub:
> - * .long <dummy_tramp_addr> // 8-byte aligned
> * mflr r11
> * bcl 20,31,$+4
> - * mflr r12
> - * ld r12, -8-SZL(r12)
> + * mflr r12 // lr/r12 stores pc of current(this) inst.
> + * ld r12, 20(r12) // offset(dummy_tramp_addr) from prev inst. is 20
> * mtctr r12
> - * mtlr r11 // needed to retain ftrace ABI
> + * mtlr r11 // needed to retain ftrace ABI
> * bctr
> + * .long <dummy_tramp_addr> // SZL bytes aligned
> */
> - if (image)
> - *((unsigned long *)&image[ctx->idx]) = (unsigned long)dummy_tramp;
> -
> - ctx->idx += SZL / 4;
> long_branch_stub_idx = ctx->idx;
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R11));
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCL4());
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R12));
> - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R12, _R12, -8-SZL));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R12, _R12, 20));
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12));
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTLR(_R11));
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTR());
>
> + if (image)
> + *((unsigned long *)&image[ctx->idx]) = (unsigned long)dummy_tramp;
> +
> + ctx->idx += SZL / 4;
> +
> if (!bpf_jit_ool_stub) {
> bpf_jit_ool_stub = (ctx->idx - ool_stub_idx) * 4;
> bpf_jit_long_branch_stub = (ctx->idx - long_branch_stub_idx) * 4;
> @@ -1309,6 +1310,7 @@ static void do_isync(void *info __maybe_unused)
> * bpf_func:
> * [nop|b] ool_stub
> * 2. Out-of-line stub:
> + * nop // optional nop for alignment
> * ool_stub:
> * mflr r0
> * [b|bl] <bpf_prog>/<long_branch_stub>
> @@ -1316,14 +1318,14 @@ static void do_isync(void *info __maybe_unused)
> * b bpf_func + 4
> * 3. Long branch stub:
> * long_branch_stub:
> - * .long <branch_addr>/<dummy_tramp>
> * mflr r11
> * bcl 20,31,$+4
> * mflr r12
> - * ld r12, -16(r12)
> + * ld r12, 20(r12)
> * mtctr r12
> * mtlr r11 // needed to retain ftrace ABI
> * bctr
> + * .long <branch_addr>/<dummy_tramp>
> *
> * dummy_tramp is used to reduce synchronization requirements.
> *
> @@ -1425,10 +1427,12 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type old_t,
> * 1. Update the address in the long branch stub:
> * If new_addr is out of range, we will have to use the long branch stub, so patch new_addr
> * here. Otherwise, revert to dummy_tramp, but only if we had patched old_addr here.
> + *
> + * dummy_tramp_addr moved to bottom of long branch stub.
> */
> if ((new_addr && !is_offset_in_branch_range(new_addr - ip)) ||
> (old_addr && !is_offset_in_branch_range(old_addr - ip)))
> - ret = patch_ulong((void *)(bpf_func_end - bpf_jit_long_branch_stub - SZL),
> + ret = patch_ulong((void *)(bpf_func_end - SZL), /* SZL: dummy_tramp_addr offset */
> (new_addr && !is_offset_in_branch_range(new_addr - ip)) ?
> (unsigned long)new_addr : (unsigned long)dummy_tramp);
> if (ret)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 7:15 [PATCH v13 0/8] powerpc/bpf: address missing verifier selftest coverage Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 7:15 ` [PATCH v13 1/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix compare instruction emitted for tailcall Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:30 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:15 ` [PATCH v13 2/8] powerpc64/bpf: fix percpu private stack leak on JIT failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:31 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 3/8] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 8:48 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:31 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 4/8] powerpc/bpf: fix alignment of long branch trampoline address Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 8:23 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 8:35 ` Hari Bathini
2026-09-08 16:32 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 5/8] powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 8:46 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2026-09-08 16:32 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix powerpc JIT disassembly failure Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 7/8] selftests/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-08-31 7:16 ` [PATCH v13 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tailcall " Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2026-08-31 8:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 16:33 ` R Nageswara Sastry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f072a9a-c656-4f79-a805-f90dee35bfde@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yeswanth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox