Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	 Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] selftests/bpf: Use bpf_link attachments in test_sockmap
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:12:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577531139c4db3cb35f3f40e23587bcb9815b0ba.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmnfujwg.fsf@cloudflare.com>

On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 21:36 +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:12 AM -07, John Fastabend wrote:
> > Geliang Tang wrote:
> > > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > > 
> > > Switch attachments to bpf_link using
> > > bpf_program__attach_sockmap() instead
> > > of bpf_prog_attach().
> > 
> > Sorry it took me a few days to get to this.
> > 
> > Is there a reason to push this to links vs just leave it as is? I
> > had
> > a plan to port all the test_sockmap tests into prog_tests anyways.
> > I'll
> > try to push some initial patch next week.

Great, I strongly agree with porting them into prog_tests. I am also
willing to participate in implementing this plan together.

> > 
> > The one advantage of test_sockmap is we can have it run for longer
> > runs by pushing different options through so might be worth keeping
> > just for that.
> > 
> > If you really want links here I'm OK with that I guess just asking.
> 
> It was me who suggested the switch to bpf_link in reaction to a
> series
> of cleanups to prog_type and prog_attach_type submitted by Geliang.

Yes, patches 3-5 address Jakub's suggestion: switching attachments to
bpf_link.

> Relevant threads:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9c10d9f974f07fcb354a43a8eca67acb2fafc587.1715926605.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240522080936.2475833-1-jakub@cloudflare.com
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e27d7d0c1e0e79b0acd22ac6ad5d8f9f00225303.1716372485.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn
> 
> I thought bpf_links added more value than cleaning up "old style"
> attachments.

Other patches 1-2, 6-8 are small fixes which I found while trying to
solve the NONBLOCK issue [1]. Yes, I haven't given up on solving this
issue yet. I think it must be solved, since there is a bug somewhere.
WDYT?

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/b67101632c6858d281f105b5d4e1bc62dd6b7d27.1712133039.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn/

Thanks,
-Geliang

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-28  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23  6:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] fixes for test_sockmap Geliang Tang
2024-05-23  6:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] selftests/bpf: Fix tx_prog_fd values in test_sockmap Geliang Tang
2024-05-27 17:02   ` John Fastabend
2024-05-23  6:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] selftests/bpf: Drop duplicate definition of i " Geliang Tang
2024-05-27 17:03   ` John Fastabend
2024-05-23  6:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] selftests/bpf: Use bpf_link attachments " Geliang Tang
2024-05-27 17:12   ` John Fastabend
2024-05-27 19:36     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-05-28  4:12       ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2024-05-30 23:45         ` John Fastabend
2024-05-31 11:13           ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-05-31 14:35             ` Geliang Tang
2024-05-23  6:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] selftests/bpf: Replace tx_prog_fd with tx_prog " Geliang Tang
2024-05-23  6:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Drop prog_fd array " Geliang Tang
2024-05-23  6:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix size of map_fd " Geliang Tang
2024-05-27 17:06   ` John Fastabend
2024-05-23  6:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] selftests/bpf: Check length of recv " Geliang Tang
2024-05-27 17:06   ` John Fastabend
2024-05-23  6:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Drop duplicate bpf_map_lookup_elem " Geliang Tang
2024-05-27 17:06   ` John Fastabend
2024-05-31 11:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] fixes for test_sockmap Jakub Sitnicki
2024-06-03 17:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577531139c4db3cb35f3f40e23587bcb9815b0ba.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox