From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] iommufd: Add enforced_cache_coherency to iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc()
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:03:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e19a851-cf75-4591-e3fa-8d10d5b7e85f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAikdKoQkSfqxMxc@nvidia.com>
On 3/8/23 11:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 09:04:47PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>>> + /* Try to upgrade the domain we have */
>>> + if (idev->enforce_cache_coherency) {
>>> + rc = iommufd_hw_pagetable_enforce_cc(hwpt);
>>> + if (rc)
>>> + return rc;
>> As "HWPT should have the coherency set properly for the device that it
>> is being created for when it is created", is it an incompatible case if
>>
>> idev->enforce_cache_coherency && !hwpt->enforce_cache_coherency
>>
>> ?
>>
>> If so, why not,
>>
>> if (idev->enforce_cache_coherency && !hwpt->enforce_cache_coherency)
>> return -EINVAL;
> In principle you can create a HWPT for device A and then later attach
> it to device B
>
> If B requires coherency then we try to upgrade the existing domain.
>
> This is an effort to try an minimize the number of domains that we
> need to have for simpe IOAS based cases where we don't want to spawn
> two auto domains
OK. Clear to me now. Actually hwpt->enforce_cache_coherency makes sense
only after it is attached to an idev.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 0:35 [PATCH v2 00/17] Add iommufd physical device operations for replace and alloc hwpt Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] iommufd: Move isolated msi enforcement to iommufd_device_bind() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 2:55 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-09 12:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] iommufd: Add iommufd_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 3:18 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-09 15:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:30 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] iommufd: Replace the hwpt->devices list with iommufd_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 11:56 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 10:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-10 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] iommu: Export iommu_get_resv_regions() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 12:06 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 14:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] iommufd: Keep track of each device's reserved regions instead of groups Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 12:32 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 15:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09 1:43 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 10:42 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] iommufd: Use the iommufd_group to avoid duplicate MSI setup Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:42 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] iommufd: Make sw_msi_start a group global Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] iommufd: Move putting a hwpt to a helper function Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 12:42 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 10:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] iommufd: Add enforced_cache_coherency to iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 13:04 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 15:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09 2:03 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2023-03-09 2:05 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] iommufd: Reorganize iommufd_device_attach into iommufd_device_change_pt Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 13:46 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 11:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-10 15:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] iommu: Introduce a new iommu_group_replace_domain() API Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 13:48 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] iommufd: Add iommufd_device_replace() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09 1:14 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 11:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-10 15:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] iommufd: Make destroy_rwsem use a lock class per object type Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] iommufd/selftest: Test iommufd_device_replace() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09 1:21 ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] iommufd/selftest: Return the real idev id from selftest mock_domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] iommufd/selftest: Add a selftest for IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e19a851-cf75-4591-e3fa-8d10d5b7e85f@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox