Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] iommufd: Reorganize iommufd_device_attach into iommufd_device_change_pt
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:01:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAtGS5pZF7fnsCJ6@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52760C4E5C89118C1B898DA48CBA9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:26:42AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 8:36 AM
> > 
> > @@ -379,52 +388,57 @@ static int
> > iommufd_device_auto_get_domain(struct iommufd_device *idev,
> > 
> >  		if (!iommufd_lock_obj(&hwpt->obj))
> >  			continue;
> > -		rc = iommufd_device_do_attach(idev, hwpt);
> > -		iommufd_put_object(&hwpt->obj);
> > -
> > -		/*
> > -		 * -EINVAL means the domain is incompatible with the device.
> > -		 * Other error codes should propagate to userspace as failure.
> > -		 * Success means the domain is attached.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (rc == -EINVAL)
> > -			continue;
> > +		destroy_hwpt = (*do_attach)(idev, hwpt);
> >  		*pt_id = hwpt->obj.id;
> 
> only when succeed?

It isn't necessary, but it can be, it is just more ugly

@@ -461,9 +468,8 @@ iommufd_device_auto_get_domain(struct iommufd_device *idev,
                if (!iommufd_lock_obj(&hwpt->obj))
                        continue;
                destroy_hwpt = (*do_attach)(idev, hwpt);
-               *pt_id = hwpt->obj.id;
-               iommufd_put_object(&hwpt->obj);
                if (IS_ERR(destroy_hwpt)) {
+                       iommufd_put_object(&hwpt->obj);
                        /*
                         * -EINVAL means the domain is incompatible with the
                         * device. Other error codes should propagate to
@@ -474,6 +480,8 @@ iommufd_device_auto_get_domain(struct iommufd_device *idev,
                                continue;
                        goto out_unlock;
                }
+               *pt_id = hwpt->obj.id;
+               iommufd_put_object(&hwpt->obj);
                goto out_unlock;
        }

but sure lets do it

> > +		if (IS_ERR(destroy_hwpt)) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * -EINVAL means the domain is incompatible with
> > the
> > +			 * device. Other error codes should propagate to
> > +			 * userspace as failure. Success means the domain is
> > +			 * attached.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (PTR_ERR(destroy_hwpt) == -EINVAL)
> > +				continue;
> > +			goto out_unlock;
> > +		}
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> 
> two goto's can be merged, if you still want to keep pt_id assignment
> in original place.

Ah, I don't like that so much stylistically. 
 
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	hwpt = iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc(idev->ictx, ioas, idev, true);
> > +	hwpt = iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc(idev->ictx, ioas, idev,
> > +					  immediate_attach);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(hwpt)) {
> > -		rc = PTR_ERR(hwpt);
> > +		destroy_hwpt = ERR_CAST(hwpt);
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	if (!immediate_attach) {
> > +		destroy_hwpt = (*do_attach)(idev, hwpt);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(destroy_hwpt))
> > +			goto out_abort;
> > +	} else {
> > +		destroy_hwpt = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> Above is a bit confusing.
> 
> On one hand we have immediate_attach for drivers which must
> complete attach before we can add the domain to iopt. From
> this angle it should always be set when calling
> iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() no matter it's attach or replace.

I looked at it for a while if we could make replace follow the same
immediate_attach flow, and it doesn't work right. The problem is we
can fail at iopt_table_add_domain() which would be after replace is
done and at that point we are pretty stuck.

The design of replace is that iommu_group_replace_domain() is the last
failable function in the process.

> On the other hand we assume *replace* doesn't work with
> driver which requires immediate_attach so it's done outside of
> iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc().

Replace with an IOAS doesn't work on those drivers. It works OK with a
HWPT.

> I'm unsure any better way of handling this transition phase, but
> at least some comment would be useful in this part.

	/*
	 * iommufd_hw_pagetable_attach() is called by
	 * iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() in immediate attachment mode, same as
	 * iommufd_device_do_attach(). So if we are in this mode then we prefer
	 * to use the immediate_attach path as it supports drivers that can't
	 * directly allocate a domain.
	 */
	bool immediate_attach = do_attach == iommufd_device_do_attach;

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-08  0:35 [PATCH v2 00/17] Add iommufd physical device operations for replace and alloc hwpt Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] iommufd: Move isolated msi enforcement to iommufd_device_bind() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  2:55   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-09 12:53     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] iommufd: Add iommufd_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  3:18   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-09 15:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:30   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] iommufd: Replace the hwpt->devices list with iommufd_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 11:56   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 10:36   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-10 14:16     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] iommu: Export iommu_get_resv_regions() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 12:06   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 14:54     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:40   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] iommufd: Keep track of each device's reserved regions instead of groups Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 12:32   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 15:02     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09  1:43       ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 10:42   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] iommufd: Use the iommufd_group to avoid duplicate MSI setup Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:42   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] iommufd: Make sw_msi_start a group global Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-10 10:45   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] iommufd: Move putting a hwpt to a helper function Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 12:42   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 10:45   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] iommufd: Add enforced_cache_coherency to iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 13:04   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08 15:06     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09  2:03       ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-09  2:05   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] iommufd: Reorganize iommufd_device_attach into iommufd_device_change_pt Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 13:46   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 11:26   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-10 15:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] iommu: Introduce a new iommu_group_replace_domain() API Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08 13:48   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] iommufd: Add iommufd_device_replace() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09  1:14   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-10 11:48   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-10 15:04     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] iommufd: Make destroy_rwsem use a lock class per object type Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] iommufd/selftest: Test iommufd_device_replace() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-09  1:21   ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] iommufd/selftest: Return the real idev id from selftest mock_domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] iommufd/selftest: Add a selftest for IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAtGS5pZF7fnsCJ6@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox