From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Kaitao cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>,
ast@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, memxor@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, vmalik@redhat.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 7/8] bpf: allow non-owning list-node args via __nonown_allowed
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 15:55:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66355df814a639c463b5f51e96fd539aa30f0679.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0419643c9a04bf0824066742e52e3f197b43909b.camel@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2026-05-13 at 15:37 -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-05-12 at 13:59 +0800, Kaitao cheng wrote:
> > From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> >
> > KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_NODE normally requires an owning reference
> > (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC with ref_obj_id). Introduce and use
> > the __nonown_allowed annotation on selected list-node arguments
> > so non-owning references with ref_obj_id==0 are accepted as well.
> >
> > This enables passing bpf_list_front() / bpf_list_back() results to:
> >
> > bpf_list_add() as insertion point (prev)
> > bpf_list_del() as deletion target (node)
> > bpf_list_is_first/last() as query target (node)
> >
> > Verifier keeps existing owning-ref checks by default; only arguments
> > annotated with __nonown_allowed bypass MEM_ALLOC/ref_obj_id checks
> > and then follow the same list-node validation path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
Also, I think it is worthwhile to move this patch before the patches
that introduce kfuncs that use the __nonown_allowed annotation.
(In case if this series goes to v11).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 5:59 [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 0/8] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 1/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 8:55 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-13 22:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 2/8] bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 22:53 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-14 1:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 3/8] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 9:36 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-13 22:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 4/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Kaitao cheng
2026-05-13 22:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 5/8] bpf: Add bpf_list_add to insert node after a given list node Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 12:05 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-13 22:35 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 6/8] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Kaitao cheng
2026-05-13 22:35 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 7/8] bpf: allow non-owning list-node args via __nonown_allowed Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 22:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-13 22:55 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Kaitao cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66355df814a639c463b5f51e96fd539aa30f0679.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox