From: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Fix counter mask iteration for RV32
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:37:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fa06233-d572-48a7-a8ef-73a7c5879c06@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240420151741.962500-9-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Hi Atish,
On 2024-04-20 10:17 AM, Atish Patra wrote:
> For RV32, used_hw_ctrs can have more than 1 word if the firmware chooses
> to interleave firmware/hardware counters indicies. Even though it's a
> unlikely scenario, handle that case by iterating over all the words
> instead of just using the first word.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index f23501898657..4eacd89141a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -652,10 +652,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> + int i;
>
> - /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
> - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0,
> - cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
> + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++)
> + /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
> + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, i * BITS_PER_LONG,
> + cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i], 0, 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> {
> - int idx = 0;
> + int idx = 0, i;
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> struct perf_event *event;
> unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
> @@ -676,11 +678,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
> u64 init_val = 0;
>
> - ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0] & ~ctr_ovf_mask;
> -
> - /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */
> - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask,
> - 0, 0, 0, 0);
> + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) {
> + ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i] & ~ctr_ovf_mask;
This is applying the mask for the first 32 logical counters to the both sets of
32 logical counters. ctr_ovf_mask needs to be 64 bits wide here, so each loop
iteration can apply the correct half of the mask.
Regards,
Samuel
> + /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */
> + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, i * BITS_PER_LONG, ctr_start_mask,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0);
> + }
>
> /* Reinitialize and start all the counter that overflowed */
> while (ctr_ovf_mask) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-20 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-20 15:17 [PATCH v8 00/24] RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 01/24] RISC-V: Fix the typo in Scountovf CSR name Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 02/24] RISC-V: Add FIRMWARE_READ_HI definition Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 03/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Read upper bits of a firmware counter Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 04/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Use BIT macro for shifting operations Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 05/24] RISC-V: Add SBI PMU snapshot definitions Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 06/24] RISC-V: KVM: Rename the SBI_STA_SHMEM_DISABLE to a generic name Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 07/24] RISC-V: Use the minor version mask while computing sbi version Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 08/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Fix counter mask iteration for RV32 Atish Patra
2024-04-20 0:37 ` Samuel Holland [this message]
2024-04-20 1:08 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 09/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function Atish Patra
2024-04-22 16:06 ` Samuel Holland
2024-04-23 20:34 ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 10/24] RISC-V: KVM: Fix the initial sample period value Atish Patra
2024-04-22 5:24 ` Anup Patel
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 11/24] RISC-V: KVM: No need to update the counter value during reset Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 12/24] RISC-V: KVM: No need to exit to the user space if perf event failed Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 13/24] RISC-V: KVM: Implement SBI PMU Snapshot feature Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 14/24] RISC-V: KVM: Add perf sampling support for guests Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 15/24] RISC-V: KVM: Support 64 bit firmware counters on RV32 Atish Patra
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 16/24] RISC-V: KVM: Improve firmware counter read function Atish Patra
2024-04-22 5:26 ` Anup Patel
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 17/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Move sbi definitions to its own header file Atish Patra
2024-04-22 5:27 ` Anup Patel
2024-04-23 8:57 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 18/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add helper functions for extension checks Atish Patra
2024-04-22 5:29 ` Anup Patel
2024-04-23 8:57 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 19/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Sscofpmf to get-reg-list test Atish Patra
2024-04-23 8:58 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 20/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU extension definitions Atish Patra
2024-04-23 8:58 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 21/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU selftest Atish Patra
2024-04-23 8:59 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 22/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Atish Patra
2024-04-23 9:00 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 23/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for counter overflow Atish Patra
2024-04-23 9:00 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v8 24/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add commandline option for SBI PMU test Atish Patra
2024-04-22 5:32 ` Anup Patel
2024-04-23 9:03 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-23 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-22 9:59 ` [PATCH v8 00/24] RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest Anup Patel
2024-04-30 5:54 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fa06233-d572-48a7-a8ef-73a7c5879c06@sifive.com \
--to=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox