From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
davidgow@google.com,
"open list : KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
"kernel@collabora.com" <kernel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: Converting kselftest test modules to kunit
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:11:14 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8412a936-b202-4313-b5b4-ce6e72a3392f@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202407150936.C32FE24CA@keescook>
On 7/15/24 9:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 03:09:24PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Hi Kees and All,
>>
>> There are several tests in kselftest subsystem which load modules to tests
>> the internals of the kernel. Most of these test modules are just loaded by
>> the kselftest, their status isn't read and reported to the user logs. Hence
>> they don't provide benefit of executing those tests.
>>
>> I've found patches from Kees where he has been converting such kselftests
>> to kunit tests [1]. The probable motivation is to move tests output of
>> kselftest subsystem which only triggers tests without correctly reporting
>> the results. On the other hand, kunit is there to test the kernel's
>> internal functions which can't be done by userspace.
>>
>> Kselftest: Test user facing APIs from userspace
>> Kunit: Test kernel's internal functions from kernelspace
>
> I would say this is a reasonable guide to how these things should
> be separated, yes. That said, much of what was kind of ad-hoc kernel
> internals testing that was triggered via kselftests is better done via
> KUnit these days, but not everything.
I started investigated when I found that kselftest doesn't parse the kernel
logs to mark these tests pass/fail. (kselftest/lib is good example of it)
>
>> This brings me to conclusion that kselftest which are loading modules to
>> test kernelspace should be converted to kunit tests. I've noted several
>> such kselftests.
>
> I would tend to agree, yes. Which stand out to you? I've mainly been
> doing the conversions when I find myself wanting to add new tests, etc.
lib
test_bitmap
prime_numbers
test_printf
test_scanf
test_strscpy (already converted, need to remove this test)
lock
test-ww_mutex module
net
test_blackhole_dev
user
test_user_copy (probably already converted, need to remove this test)
firmware
test_firmware
fpu
test_fpu
Most of these modules are found in lib/*.
Would it be desired to move these to kunit?
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 10:09 Converting kselftest test modules to kunit Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-15 16:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-07-16 8:11 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2024-07-16 17:59 ` Kees Cook
2024-07-16 18:04 ` John Hubbard
2024-07-16 18:26 ` Kees Cook
2024-07-17 21:11 ` John Hubbard
2024-07-17 10:55 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-16 7:33 ` David Gow
2024-07-17 10:47 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-17 21:44 ` John Hubbard
2024-07-26 19:35 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-29 7:55 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-07-30 22:55 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-30 5:23 ` David Gow
2024-07-30 22:53 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8412a936-b202-4313-b5b4-ce6e72a3392f@collabora.com \
--to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox