From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ldv@strace.io, macro@orcam.me.uk,
deller@gmx.de, mark.rutland@arm.com, song@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, ryan.roberts@arm.com, ada.coupriediaz@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
pengcan@kylinos.cn, dvyukov@google.com, kmal@cock.li,
lihongbo22@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/11] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall()
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:09:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <970d9689-4188-4c40-92e6-bdf1e589e8a2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251117133048.53182-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On 17/11/2025 14:30, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The generic syscall entry code has the form:
>
> | syscall_trace_enter()
> | {
> | ptrace_report_syscall_entry()
> | }
> |
> | syscall_exit_work()
> | {
> | ptrace_report_syscall_exit()
> | }
>
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code, split
> report_syscall() to two separate enter and exit functions to align
> the structure of the arm64 code with syscall_trace_enter() and
> syscall_exit_work() from the generic entry code.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 4b001121c72d..5534c175ceb7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ enum ptrace_syscall_dir {
> PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT,
> };
This is now unused so it should be removed.
>
> -static void report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)
> +static void report_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
Nit: better to call it "report_syscall_entry" to match its final name.
> {
> int regno;
> unsigned long saved_reg;
> @@ -2340,13 +2340,24 @@ static void report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)
> */
> regno = (is_compat_task() ? 12 : 7);
> saved_reg = regs->regs[regno];
> - regs->regs[regno] = dir;
> + regs->regs[regno] = PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER;
>
> - if (dir == PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER) {
> - if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> - forget_syscall(regs);
> - regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
> - } else if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) {
> + if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> + forget_syscall(regs);
> + regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
> +}
> +
> +static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + int regno;
> + unsigned long saved_reg;
> +
> + /* See comment for report_syscall_enter() above */
> + regno = (is_compat_task() ? 12 : 7);
Probably best not to duplicate such magic numbers, moving this line to a
helper would be good.
- Kevin
> + saved_reg = regs->regs[regno];
> + regs->regs[regno] = PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT;
> +
> + if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) {
> ptrace_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0);
> regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg;
> } else {
> @@ -2366,7 +2377,7 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
>
> if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) {
> - report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER);
> + report_syscall_enter(regs);
> if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)
> return NO_SYSCALL;
> }
> @@ -2394,7 +2405,7 @@ void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> trace_sys_exit(regs, syscall_get_return_value(current, regs));
>
> if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SINGLESTEP))
> - report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT);
> + report_syscall_exit(regs);
>
> rseq_syscall(regs);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 13:30 [PATCH v7 00/11] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:09 ` Kevin Brodsky [this message]
2025-11-19 9:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-25 13:06 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:09 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-20 11:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] arm64/ptrace: Refator el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:10 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-20 12:03 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] entry: Add syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-18 17:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] arm64/ptrace: Handle ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:12 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-21 4:15 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-24 9:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:12 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-21 7:29 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() heleper Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:12 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] entry: Add arch_ptrace_report_syscall_entry/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:13 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24 9:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-24 15:23 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-25 2:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-25 13:10 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] entry: Add has_syscall_work() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:13 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-25 3:23 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:14 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-25 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] selftests: sud_test: Support aarch64 Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=970d9689-4188-4c40-92e6-bdf1e589e8a2@arm.com \
--to=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kmal@cock.li \
--cc=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox