Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <oleg@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <luto@kernel.org>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
	<kees@kernel.org>, <wad@chromium.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <ldv@strace.io>, <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	<deller@gmx.de>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <song@kernel.org>,
	<mbenes@suse.cz>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	<ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	<broonie@kernel.org>, <pengcan@kylinos.cn>, <dvyukov@google.com>,
	<kmal@cock.li>, <lihongbo22@huawei.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/11] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:00:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a832b414-8da7-6333-b01e-ffd509f52ab7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39243d7f-e72a-4d37-8cd2-fb9c9f53e751@arm.com>



On 2025/11/19 1:14, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 17/11/2025 14:30, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> index 6225981fbbdb..c91938718468 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/compat.h>
>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>  
>> +#include <asm/vdso.h>
>> +
>>  typedef long (*syscall_fn_t)(const struct pt_regs *regs);
>>  
>>  extern const syscall_fn_t sys_call_table[];
>> @@ -114,12 +116,30 @@ static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task)
>>  	return AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline bool has_syscall_work(unsigned long flags)
>> +static inline bool arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>> -	return unlikely(flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK);
>> -}
>> +	unsigned long vdso = (unsigned long)current->mm->context.vdso;
>> +	unsigned long vdso_pages, vdso_text_len;
>> +	unsigned long pc = regs->pc - 4;
> 
> On AArch32 (i.e. COMPAT), instructions may be 16-bit (in T32/Thumb), so
> we shouldn't blindly use PC - 4.
> 
>>  
>> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags);
>> -void syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +	if (is_compat_task()) {
>> +		vdso = (unsigned long)current->mm->context.sigpage;
>> +		if (pc >= vdso && pc < vdso + PAGE_SIZE)
> 
> Just return that expression (instead of true/false).
> 
> I think the approach is reasonable, as we have 4 possible trampolines in
> COMPAT and they all live in a dedicated page. I don't think we need to
> worry about offsetting PC, because even if it points after the last
> trampoline, it will still fall within the page. IOW, just use the
> unmodified value of regs->pc.
> 
>> +			return true;
>> +
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +#endif
>> +	if (regs->syscallno != __NR_rt_sigreturn)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	vdso_pages = (vdso_end - vdso_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +	vdso_text_len = vdso_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +	if (pc < vdso || pc >= vdso + vdso_text_len)
>> +		return false;
> 
> Why not use the same approach as x86 and simply check that regs->pc
> points after the trampoline? We already have a way to get the address of
> the vDSO's sigreturn trampoline on arm64:
> VDSO_SYMBOL(current->mm->context.vdso, sigtramp) (see signal.c). The
> trampoline consists of two instructions that cannot be changed (pretty
> much part of the ABI), so we could compare regs->pc with sigtramp + 8.

Will update it.

> 
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>>  #endif	/* __ASM_SYSCALL_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> index f241b8601ebd..0c083be23018 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct thread_info {
>>  	void			*scs_sp;
>>  #endif
>>  	u32			cpu;
>> +	unsigned long		syscall_work;   /* SYSCALL_WORK_ flags */
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define thread_saved_pc(tsk)	\
>> @@ -65,11 +66,6 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>>  #define TIF_UPROBE		5	/* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
>>  #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	6	/* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
>>  #define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	7	/* signal notifications exist */
>> -#define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	8	/* syscall trace active */
>> -#define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	9	/* syscall auditing */
>> -#define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT	10	/* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */
>> -#define TIF_SECCOMP		11	/* syscall secure computing */
>> -#define TIF_SYSCALL_EMU		12	/* syscall emulation active */
>>  #define TIF_PATCH_PENDING	13	/* pending live patching update */
>>  #define TIF_MEMDIE		18	/* is terminating due to OOM killer */
>>  #define TIF_FREEZE		19
>> @@ -92,30 +88,14 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>>  #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY	(1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
>>  #define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
>>  #define _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE	(1 << TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
>> -#define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)
>> -#define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT)
>> -#define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
>> -#define _TIF_SECCOMP		(1 << TIF_SECCOMP)
>> -#define _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)
>>  #define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING	(1 << TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>>  #define _TIF_UPROBE		(1 << TIF_UPROBE)
>> -#define _TIF_SINGLESTEP		(1 << TIF_SINGLESTEP)
>>  #define _TIF_32BIT		(1 << TIF_32BIT)
>>  #define _TIF_SVE		(1 << TIF_SVE)
>>  #define _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	(1 << TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT)
>>  #define _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
>>  #define _TIF_TSC_SIGSEGV	(1 << TIF_TSC_SIGSEGV)
>>  
>> -#define _TIF_WORK_MASK		(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY | \
>> -				 _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
>> -				 _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
>> -				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
>> -				 _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> 
> AFAICT this was already unused before this series, since commit
> b3cf07851b6c ("arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry"). It should be
> removed in a separate commit.

Yes, it was already unused before this series

> 
>> [...]
>>
>> -void syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> -{
>> -	unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
>> -
>> -	rseq_syscall(regs);
>> -
>> -	if (has_syscall_work(flags) || flags & _TIF_SINGLESTEP)
> 
> I believe switching to the generic function introduces a change here:
> syscall_exit_work() is only called if a flag in SYSCALL_WORK_EXIT is
> set, and this set does not include SYSCALL_EMU and SECCOMP. Practically
> this means that audit_syscall_exit() will no longer be called if only
> SECCOMP and/or SYSCALL_EMU is set.
> 
> It doesn't feel like a major behaviour change, but it should be pointed out.

We can add "ARCH_SYSCALL_WORK_EXIT" to be defined as "SECCOMP
||SYSCALL_EMU" to keep the behaviour unchanged.

> 
> - Kevin
> 
>> -		syscall_trace_exit(regs, flags);
>> -}
>>
>> [...]
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-25  4:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-17 13:30 [PATCH v7 00/11] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:09   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-19  9:49     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-25 13:06       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:09   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-20 11:05     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] arm64/ptrace: Refator el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:10   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-20 12:03     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] entry: Add syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-18 17:11   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] arm64/ptrace: Handle ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:12   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-21  4:15     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-24  9:16       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:12   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-21  7:29     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() heleper Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:12   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] entry: Add arch_ptrace_report_syscall_entry/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:13   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-24  9:34     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-24 15:23       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-25  2:43         ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-25 13:10           ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] entry: Add has_syscall_work() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:13   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-25  3:23     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-11-18 17:14   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-25  4:00     ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2025-11-17 13:30 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] selftests: sud_test: Support aarch64 Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a832b414-8da7-6333-b01e-ffd509f52ab7@huawei.com \
    --to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=kmal@cock.li \
    --cc=ldv@strace.io \
    --cc=lihongbo22@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox