Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests: Fix cpuid / vendor checking build issues

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1764 bytes --]

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:

> On 8/21/24 11:30 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 8/13/24 04:45, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >> First, generalize resctrl selftest non-contiguous CAT check to not
> >> assume non-AMD vendor implies Intel. Second, improve kselftest common
> >> parts and resctrl selftest such that the use of __cpuid_count() does
> >> not lead into a build failure (happens at least on ARM).
> >>
> >> The last patch might still require some work on which symbol the
> >> conditional in kselftest.h is implemented. I could not find any
> >> pre-existing one that could be used. Perhaps somebody who's more
> >> familiar with the kselftest build system has a better suggestion on
> >> which symbol the logic should be based at?
> >>
> >> Ilpo Järvinen (3):
> >>    selftests/resctrl: Generalize non-contiguous CAT check
> >>    selftests/resctrl: Always initialize ecx to avoid build warnings
> >>    [RFC] kselftest: Provide __cpuid_count() stub on non-x86 archs
> >>
> >>   tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h        |  6 +++++
> >>   tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk             |  4 ++++
> >>   tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------
> >>   3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> > 
> > These changes look good to me. Can you send the RFC patch without the
> > RFC tag
> > for me to pull in? I don't apply RFC patches.
> > 
> > Usama, does this fix the problem you are seeing?
>
> Yeah, build errors are resolved.

Great, thanks for testing!

I'll send v2 with RFC removed soon.

> > Hi Reinette - do these look okay to you? Can you give me an ack if they do?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > -- Shuah
> > 
> 

-- 
 i.