* [PATCH v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
@ 2026-05-24 2:58 Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-25 18:14 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-05-29 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suchit Karunakaran @ 2026-05-24 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau, memxor, song,
yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
Cc: linux-kernel, Suchit Karunakaran
Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
preserving correctness.
Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
Changes since v1:
- Removed unused variable node
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
index 1a3233a275c7..8107f5934d2d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
@@ -196,18 +196,13 @@ fq_flows_remove_front(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock,
static bool
fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
{
- struct bpf_list_node *node;
+ bool empty;
bpf_spin_lock(lock);
- node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
- if (node) {
- bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
- bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
- return false;
- }
+ empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
- return true;
+ return empty;
}
/* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
2026-05-24 2:58 [PATCH v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
@ 2026-05-25 18:14 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-05-29 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Emil Tsalapatis @ 2026-05-25 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suchit Karunakaran, andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau,
memxor, song, yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat May 23, 2026 at 10:58 PM EDT, Suchit Karunakaran wrote:
> Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
> check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
> This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
> preserving correctness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Removed unused variable node
Saw v1 before v2:
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> index 1a3233a275c7..8107f5934d2d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> @@ -196,18 +196,13 @@ fq_flows_remove_front(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock,
> static bool
> fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
> {
> - struct bpf_list_node *node;
> + bool empty;
>
> bpf_spin_lock(lock);
> - node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
> - if (node) {
> - bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
> - bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
> - return false;
> - }
> + empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
> bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
>
> - return true;
> + return empty;
> }
>
> /* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
2026-05-24 2:58 [PATCH v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-25 18:14 ` Emil Tsalapatis
@ 2026-05-29 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-05-29 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suchit Karunakaran
Cc: andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau, memxor, song,
yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 24 May 2026 08:28:53 +0530 you wrote:
> Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
> check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
> This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
> preserving correctness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9a720e090eb5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-29 3:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-24 2:58 [PATCH v2] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-25 18:14 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-05-29 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox