From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] x86: Test illegal LEA handling
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 16:44:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YugC4rUvdbroNk3M@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220731204653.2516-1-mhal@rbox.co>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> Check if the emulator throws #UD on illegal LEA.
Please explicitly state exactly what illegal LEA is being generated. Requiring
readers to connect the dots of the LEA opcode and ModR/M encoding is unnecessarily
mean :-)
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Instead of racing decoder make use of force_emulation_prefix
>
> x86/emulator.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
> index cd78e3c..c3898f2 100644
> --- a/x86/emulator.c
> +++ b/x86/emulator.c
> @@ -895,6 +895,24 @@ static void test_mov_dr(uint64_t *mem)
> report(rax == DR6_ACTIVE_LOW, "mov_dr6");
> }
>
> +static void illegal_lea_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
> +{
> + extern char illegal_lea_cont;
> +
> + ++exceptions;
> + regs->rip = (ulong)&illegal_lea_cont;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_illegal_lea(uint64_t *mem)
@mem isn't needed.
> +{
> + exceptions = 0;
> + handle_exception(UD_VECTOR, illegal_lea_handler);
No need to use a custom handler (ignore any patterns in emulator.c that suggest
it's "mandatory", emulator is one of the oldest test). ASM_TRY() can handle all
of this without any globals.
> + asm(KVM_FEP ".byte 0x48; .byte 0x8d; .byte 0xc0\n\t"
> + "illegal_lea_cont:" : : : "rax");
"emulator" is compatible with 32-bit KUT, drop the REX prefix and clobber "eax"
instead of "xax".
> + report(exceptions == 1, "illegal lea");
Be nice to future debuggers. Call out what is illegal about LEA, capitalize LEA
to make it more obvious that its an instruction, and print the expected versus
actual.
> + handle_exception(UD_VECTOR, 0);
> +}
So this?
static void test_illegal_lea(void)
{
unsigned int vector;
asm volatile (ASM_TRY("1f")
KVM_FEP ".byte 0x8d; .byte 0xc0\n\t"
"1:"
: : : "memory", "eax");
vector = exception_vector();
report(vector == UD_VECTOR,
"Wanted #UD on LEA with /reg, got vector = %d", vector);
}
> +
> static void test_push16(uint64_t *mem)
> {
> uint64_t rsp1, rsp2;
> @@ -1193,6 +1211,7 @@ int main(void)
> test_smsw_reg(mem);
> test_nop(mem);
> test_mov_dr(mem);
> + test_illegal_lea(mem);
> } else {
> report_skip("skipping register-only tests, "
> "use kvm.force_emulation_prefix=1 to enable");
> --
> 2.32.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-01 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-29 13:48 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: emulator: Fix illegal LEA handling Michal Luczaj
2022-07-29 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: x86: Test " Michal Luczaj
2022-07-29 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-31 20:43 ` Michal Luczaj
2022-07-31 20:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] " Michal Luczaj
2022-08-01 16:44 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-08-02 23:07 ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-02 23:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 17:21 ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] x86: emulator.c cleanup: Save and restore exception handlers Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/4] x86: emulator.c cleanup: Use ASM_TRY for the UD_VECTOR cases Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 18:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 11:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-05 18:55 ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-05 19:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-06 2:00 ` Nadav Amit
2022-08-06 11:08 ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/4] x86: Test emulator's handling of LEA with /reg Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] x86: Extend ASM_TRY to handle #UD thrown by FEP-triggered emulator Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 18:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: emulator: Fix illegal LEA handling Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YugC4rUvdbroNk3M@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox