Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] x86: Extend ASM_TRY to handle #UD thrown by FEP-triggered emulator
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 18:16:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yuq7gMTpRqGlVdcW@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220803172508.1215-4-mhal@rbox.co>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> TRY_ASM() mishandles #UD thrown by the forced-emulation-triggered emulator.
> While the faulting address stored in the exception table points at forced
> emulation prefix, when #UD comes, RIP is 5 bytes (size of KVM_FEP) ahead
> and the exception ends up unhandled.

Ah, but that's only the behavior if FEP is allowed.  If FEP is disabled, then the
#UD will be on the prefix.

> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Heh, I didn't really suggest this because I didn't even realize it was a problem :-)

> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
> ---
> While here, I've also took the opportunity to merge both 32 and 64-bit
> versions of ASM_TRY() (.dc.a for .long and .quad), but perhaps there
> were some reasons for not using .dc.a?

This should be a separate patch, and probably as the very last patch in case dc.a
isn't viable for whatever reason.  I've never seen/used dc.a so I really have no
idea whether or not it's ok to use.

As a "safe" alternative that can be done before adding ASM_TRY_FEP(), we can steal
the kernel's __ASM_SEL() approach so that you don't have to implement two versions
of ASM_TRY_FEP().  That's worth doing because __ASM_SEL() can probably be used in
other places too.  Patch at the bottom.

>  lib/x86/desc.h | 11 +++++------
>  x86/emulator.c |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.h b/lib/x86/desc.h
> index 2a285eb..99cc224 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.h
> @@ -80,21 +80,20 @@ typedef struct  __attribute__((packed)) {
>  	u16 iomap_base;
>  } tss64_t;
>  
> -#ifdef __x86_64
>  #define ASM_TRY(catch)			\
>  	"movl $0, %%gs:4 \n\t"		\
>  	".pushsection .data.ex \n\t"	\
> -	".quad 1111f, " catch "\n\t"	\
> +	".dc.a 1111f, " catch "\n\t"	\
>  	".popsection \n\t"		\
>  	"1111:"
> -#else
> -#define ASM_TRY(catch)			\
> +
> +#define ASM_TRY_PREFIXED(prefix, catch)	\

Rather than a generic ASM_TRY_PREFIXED, I think it makes sense to add an explicit
ASM_TRY_FEP() that takes in only the label and hardcodes the FEP prefix.  The "#UD
skips the prefix" behavior is unique to "successful" forced emulation, so this is
literally the only scenario where skipping a prefix is expected/correct.

*sigh*

That'll require moving the KVM_FEP definition, but that's a good change on its
own.  Probably throw it in lib/x86/processor.h?

>  	"movl $0, %%gs:4 \n\t"		\
>  	".pushsection .data.ex \n\t"	\
> -	".long 1111f, " catch "\n\t"	\
> +	".dc.a 1111f, " catch "\n\t"	\
>  	".popsection \n\t"		\
> +	prefix "\n\t"			\
>  	"1111:"
> -#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * selector     32-bit                        64-bit
> diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
> index df0bc49..d2a5302 100644
> --- a/x86/emulator.c
> +++ b/x86/emulator.c
> @@ -900,8 +900,8 @@ static void test_illegal_lea(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int vector;
>  
> -	asm volatile (ASM_TRY("1f")
> -		      KVM_FEP ".byte 0x8d; .byte 0xc0\n\t"
> +	asm volatile (ASM_TRY_PREFIXED(KVM_FEP, "1f")
> +		      ".byte 0x8d; .byte 0xc0\n\t"

Put this patch earlier in the series, before test_illegal_lea() is introduced.
Both so that there's no unnecessary churn, and also because running the illegal
LEA testcase without this patch will fail.

>  		      "1:"
>  		      : : : "memory", "eax");

---
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:09:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Dedup 32-bit vs. 64-bit ASM_TRY() by stealing kernel's
 __ASM_SEL()

Steal the kernel's __ASM_SEL() implementation and use it to consolidate
ASM_TRY().  The only difference between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions is
the size of the address stored in the table.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 lib/x86/desc.h      | 19 +++++--------------
 lib/x86/processor.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.h b/lib/x86/desc.h
index 2a285eb6..e670ebf2 100644
--- a/lib/x86/desc.h
+++ b/lib/x86/desc.h
@@ -80,21 +80,12 @@ typedef struct  __attribute__((packed)) {
 	u16 iomap_base;
 } tss64_t;

-#ifdef __x86_64
-#define ASM_TRY(catch)			\
-	"movl $0, %%gs:4 \n\t"		\
-	".pushsection .data.ex \n\t"	\
-	".quad 1111f, " catch "\n\t"	\
-	".popsection \n\t"		\
+#define ASM_TRY(catch)						\
+	"movl $0, %%gs:4 \n\t"					\
+	".pushsection .data.ex \n\t"				\
+	__ASM_SEL(.long, .quad) " 1111f,  " catch "\n\t"	\
+	".popsection \n\t"					\
 	"1111:"
-#else
-#define ASM_TRY(catch)			\
-	"movl $0, %%gs:4 \n\t"		\
-	".pushsection .data.ex \n\t"	\
-	".long 1111f, " catch "\n\t"	\
-	".popsection \n\t"		\
-	"1111:"
-#endif

 /*
  * selector     32-bit                        64-bit
diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
index 03242206..30e2de87 100644
--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
@@ -19,6 +19,18 @@
 #  define S "4"
 #endif

+#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
+#define __ASM_FORM(x, ...)	x,## __VA_ARGS__
+#else
+#define __ASM_FORM(x, ...)	" " xstr(x,##__VA_ARGS__) " "
+#endif
+
+#ifndef __x86_64__
+#define __ASM_SEL(a,b)		__ASM_FORM(a)
+#else
+#define __ASM_SEL(a,b)		__ASM_FORM(b)
+#endif
+
 #define DB_VECTOR 1
 #define BP_VECTOR 3
 #define UD_VECTOR 6

base-commit: a106b30d39425b7afbaa3bbd4aab16fd26d333e7
--


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-03 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-29 13:48 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: emulator: Fix illegal LEA handling Michal Luczaj
2022-07-29 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: x86: Test " Michal Luczaj
2022-07-29 16:53   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-31 20:43     ` Michal Luczaj
2022-07-31 20:46     ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] " Michal Luczaj
2022-08-01 16:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-02 23:07         ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-02 23:41           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 17:21             ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25             ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] x86: emulator.c cleanup: Save and restore exception handlers Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25               ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/4] x86: emulator.c cleanup: Use ASM_TRY for the UD_VECTOR cases Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 18:21                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 11:42                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-05 18:55                     ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-05 19:59                       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-06  2:00                         ` Nadav Amit
2022-08-06 11:08                           ` Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25               ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/4] x86: Test emulator's handling of LEA with /reg Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 17:25               ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] x86: Extend ASM_TRY to handle #UD thrown by FEP-triggered emulator Michal Luczaj
2022-08-03 18:16                 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-08-05 11:50                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-29 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: emulator: Fix illegal LEA handling Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yuq7gMTpRqGlVdcW@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox