From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] selftests/mm: fix invocation of tests that are run via shell scripts
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 12:19:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e31f1411-1986-c25d-af74-05ad73a53c8d@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHoL8vJPIUzP2RKN@x1n>
On 6/2/23 08:34, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:33:51PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> We cannot depend upon git to reliably retain the executable bit on shell
>> scripts, or so I was told several years ago while working on this same
>> run_vmtests.sh script. And sure enough, things such as test_hmm.sh are
>> lately failing to run, due to lacking execute permissions.
>>
>> A nice clean way to fix this would have been to use TEST_PROGS instead
>> of TEST_FILES for the .sh scripts here. That tells the selftest
>> framework to run these (and emit a warning if the files are not
>> executable, but still run them anyway).
>>
>> Unfortunately, run_vmtests.sh has its own run_test() routine, which does
>> *not* do the right thing for shell scripts.
>>
>> Fix this by explicitly adding "bash" to each of the shell script
>> invocations. Leave fixing the overall approach to another day.
>
> Is it possible someone just doesn't have "bash" at all? I used to only use
Well, maybe [1]. But that someone won't be running these tests as-is, because
the tests explicitly require bash, even before this patch.
> "sh" without bash installed I think, but that was not on Linux, so I'm not
> sure how much that applies..
sh invocations are for when you want to express that this script should
avoid using bash-specific things, in order to ensure portability to
other environments.
But here, the run_vmtests.sh file requires bash already, as per the
first line:
#!/bin/bash
...which is ultimately why I decided to use bash, rather than sh here.
>
> Maybe use $(SHELL)? I saw a bunch of usage in the tree too.
>
That's more of a Makefile construct that you are seeing, and only in a
few odd Makefiles. Recall that in Make, $(SHELL) has the same effect
that ${SHELL} has in bash/sh, by the way: dereferencing a variable.
And Make's "$(shell ...)" command is what is normally used to *run* a
shell command, in the kernel's build system.
Having said all that, I will take a quick look at what it would take
to shift over to the selftest framework's run_test() instead, in
order to avoid this ugly "fix".
[1] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/linux/kali-linux-20204-switches-the-default-shell-from-bash-to-zsh/
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 1:33 [PATCH 00/12] A minor flurry of selftest/mm fixes John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 01/12] selftests/mm: fix uffd-stress unused function warning John Hubbard
2023-06-02 9:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 15:25 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 02/12] selftests/mm: fix unused variable warning in hugetlb-madvise.c John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 18:38 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 03/12] selftests/mm: fix unused variable warning in migration.c John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 18:39 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 04/12] selftests/mm: fix a char* assignment in mlock2-tests.c John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 15:24 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-02 18:52 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-05 15:38 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-05 18:45 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 05/12] selftests/mm: fix invocation of tests that are run via shell scripts John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 20:38 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 15:34 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-02 19:19 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2023-06-02 21:36 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-02 21:46 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 06/12] selftests/mm: .gitignore: add mkdirty, va_high_addr_switch John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] selftests/mm: set -Wno-format-security to avoid uffd build warnings John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 21:22 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 08/12] selftests/mm: fix a "possibly uninitialized" warning in pkey-x86.h John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 09/12] selftests/mm: move psize(), pshift() into vm_utils.c John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 21:58 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 10/12] selftests/mm: move uffd* routines from vm_util.c to uffd-common.c John Hubbard
2023-06-02 15:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-02 22:11 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 22:38 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-02 22:52 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-03 0:43 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-03 1:18 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-03 1:39 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 11/12] selftests/mm: fix missing UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP and similar build failures John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 22:20 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-03 8:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-03 23:48 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 16:25 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-06-02 22:24 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 1:33 ` [PATCH 12/12] selftests/mm: fix uffd-unit-tests.c build failure due to missing MADV_COLLAPSE John Hubbard
2023-06-02 10:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 16:34 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-06-02 22:26 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-02 9:32 ` [PATCH 00/12] A minor flurry of selftest/mm fixes David Hildenbrand
2023-06-02 17:51 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e31f1411-1986-c25d-af74-05ad73a53c8d@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox