Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dave.hansen at intel.com (Dave Hansen)
Subject: [PATCH v14 20/22] selftests/vm: testcases must restore pkey-permissions
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:56:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea9c3220-c4dd-124a-2031-eaca6859b389@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531835365-32387-21-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>

On 07/17/2018 06:49 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Generally the signal handler restores the state of the pkey register
> before returning. However there are times when the read/write operation
> can legitamely fail without invoking the signal handler.  Eg: A
> sys_read() operaton to a write-protected page should be disallowed.  In
> such a case the state of the pkey register is not restored to its
> original state.  Test cases may not remember to restoring the key
> register state. During cleanup generically restore the key permissions.

This would, indeed be a good thing to do for a well-behaved application.

But, for selftests, why does it matter what state we leave the key in?
Doesn't the test itself need to establish permissions?  Don't we *do*
that at pkey_alloc() anyway?

What problem does this solve?

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> index 8a6afdd..ea3cf04 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -1476,8 +1476,13 @@ void run_tests_once(void)
>  		pkey_tests[test_nr](ptr, pkey);
>  		dprintf1("freeing test memory: %p\n", ptr);
>  		free_pkey_malloc(ptr);
> +
> +		/* restore the permission on the key after use */
> +		pkey_access_allow(pkey);
> +		pkey_write_allow(pkey);
>  		sys_pkey_free(pkey);
>  
> +
>  		dprintf1("pkey_faults: %d\n", pkey_faults);
>  		dprintf1("orig_pkey_faults: %d\n", orig_pkey_faults);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dave.hansen@intel.com (Dave Hansen)
Subject: [PATCH v14 20/22] selftests/vm: testcases must restore pkey-permissions
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:56:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea9c3220-c4dd-124a-2031-eaca6859b389@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180718165649.wJN6XzFRGPcg5UReas0HdrXbDV4D9BolbtoZPG40-K0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531835365-32387-21-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>

On 07/17/2018 06:49 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Generally the signal handler restores the state of the pkey register
> before returning. However there are times when the read/write operation
> can legitamely fail without invoking the signal handler.  Eg: A
> sys_read() operaton to a write-protected page should be disallowed.  In
> such a case the state of the pkey register is not restored to its
> original state.  Test cases may not remember to restoring the key
> register state. During cleanup generically restore the key permissions.

This would, indeed be a good thing to do for a well-behaved application.

But, for selftests, why does it matter what state we leave the key in?
Doesn't the test itself need to establish permissions?  Don't we *do*
that at pkey_alloc() anyway?

What problem does this solve?

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> index 8a6afdd..ea3cf04 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -1476,8 +1476,13 @@ void run_tests_once(void)
>  		pkey_tests[test_nr](ptr, pkey);
>  		dprintf1("freeing test memory: %p\n", ptr);
>  		free_pkey_malloc(ptr);
> +
> +		/* restore the permission on the key after use */
> +		pkey_access_allow(pkey);
> +		pkey_write_allow(pkey);
>  		sys_pkey_free(pkey);
>  
> +
>  		dprintf1("pkey_faults: %d\n", pkey_faults);
>  		dprintf1("orig_pkey_faults: %d\n", orig_pkey_faults);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-18 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-17 13:49 [PATCH v14 00/22] selftests, powerpc, x86 : Memory Protection Keys linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49 ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 01/22] selftests/x86: Move protecton key selftest to arch neutral directory linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:25   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:25     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 02/22] selftests/vm: rename all references to pkru to a generic name linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 03/22] selftests/vm: move generic definitions to header file linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:26   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:26     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 04/22] selftests/vm: move arch-specific definitions to arch-specific header linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:27   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:27     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 05/22] selftests/vm: Make gcc check arguments of sigsafe_printf() linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 06/22] selftests/vm: typecast the pkey register linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:32   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:32     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 07/22] selftests/vm: generic function to handle shadow key register linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:34   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:34     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 08/22] selftests/vm: fix the wrong assert in pkey_disable_set() linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:36   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:36     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 09/22] selftests/vm: fixed bugs in pkey_disable_clear() linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:43   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:43     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 10/22] selftests/vm: fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really random linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:45   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:45     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 11/22] selftests/vm: introduce two arch independent abstraction linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 15:52   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 15:52     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 12/22] selftests/vm: pkey register should match shadow pkey linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:00   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 16:00     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 13/22] selftests/vm: generic cleanup linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:06   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 16:06     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 14/22] selftests/vm: Introduce generic abstractions linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:38   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 16:38     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 15/22] selftests/vm: powerpc implementation to check support for pkey linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:42   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 16:42     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 16/22] selftests/vm: fix an assertion in test_pkey_alloc_exhaust() linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:52   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 16:52     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 17/22] selftests/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect access violation linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 18/22] selftests/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect write violation linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 19/22] selftests/vm: detect write violation on a mapped access-denied-key page linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 20/22] selftests/vm: testcases must restore pkey-permissions linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 16:56   ` dave.hansen [this message]
2018-07-18 16:56     ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 21/22] selftests/vm: sub-page allocator linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-17 13:49 ` [PATCH v14 22/22] selftests/vm: test correct behavior of pkey-0 linuxram
2018-07-17 13:49   ` Ram Pai
2018-07-18 17:03   ` dave.hansen
2018-07-18 17:03     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea9c3220-c4dd-124a-2031-eaca6859b389@intel.com \
    --to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox