From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
"linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: core: use deferred probing if default trigger isn't available yet
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:00:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170226210014.GA435@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82111085-baf8-efb9-d195-47153aa3b918@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2403 bytes --]
On Sun 2017-02-26 18:10:56, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 02/23/2017 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > Am 23.02.2017 um 22:08 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> >> On Wed 2017-02-22 21:35:52, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >>> When registering a LED device we have the option to set a default trigger.
> >>> Depending on load order of drivers this trigger may not be available yet.
> >>> (affected LED device in my case: a DT-configured GPIO LED)
> >>> So far if the default trigger can't be found this error is silently
> >>> ignored.
> >>>
> >>> Let's change this to return EPROBE_DEFER if the default trigger can't be
> >>> found. This gives the system the chance to probe the LED device later
> >>> once the trigger is available.
> >>
> >> I see a lot of EPROBE_DEFERs on N900, and it is quite nasty, as it
> >> spams a log a lot.
> >>
> > Usually error messages are printed only if there is an error and it is not
> > EPROBE_DEFER. However indeed there still may be several drivers not
> > taking into account that a subsystem they depend on may return
> > EPROBE_DEFER and this should not be treated as "hard error".
> >
> >> Rather then re-trying LED registration few times, could we make sure
> >> leds are always registered after triggers or something like that?
> >>
> > I'm afraid if guaranteeing a particular order would be possible w/o
> > significant effort then the whole deferred probing concept wouldn't exist.
> >
> > I could imagine that we can try reordering definitions in the DTS to
> > ensure a certain load order. But this might be somewhat fragile.
> > So using the existing concept of deferred probing seems to me to be
> > the cleaner solution.
>
> We could go for a solution similar to v4l2-async.c mechanism which
> allows for deferring video pipeline linking until all video pipeline
> entities are probed, but in the LED subsystem case I think it would be
> an overengineering. V4L2 media device has to wait for completion of
> probing of several v4l2 drivers, whereas here we've got to wait for
> a single driver. EPROBE_DEFER seems to fit for that ideally.
I was more thinking of ... just initialize all triggers earlier then
all LEDs?
Initcalls do have few levels we could use..
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-26 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 20:35 [PATCH] leds: core: use deferred probing if default trigger isn't available yet Heiner Kallweit
2017-02-23 21:04 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-02-23 21:25 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-02-26 17:09 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-02-23 21:08 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-23 21:23 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-02-26 17:10 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-02-26 21:00 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-02-26 22:07 ` Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170226210014.GA435@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox