From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
"linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: core: use deferred probing if default trigger isn't available yet
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:10:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82111085-baf8-efb9-d195-47153aa3b918@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f9ec7ec-b1ce-48ab-b0f0-dbdbf4e7e18f@gmail.com>
On 02/23/2017 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 23.02.2017 um 22:08 schrieb Pavel Machek:
>> On Wed 2017-02-22 21:35:52, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> When registering a LED device we have the option to set a default trigger.
>>> Depending on load order of drivers this trigger may not be available yet.
>>> (affected LED device in my case: a DT-configured GPIO LED)
>>> So far if the default trigger can't be found this error is silently
>>> ignored.
>>>
>>> Let's change this to return EPROBE_DEFER if the default trigger can't be
>>> found. This gives the system the chance to probe the LED device later
>>> once the trigger is available.
>>
>> I see a lot of EPROBE_DEFERs on N900, and it is quite nasty, as it
>> spams a log a lot.
>>
> Usually error messages are printed only if there is an error and it is not
> EPROBE_DEFER. However indeed there still may be several drivers not
> taking into account that a subsystem they depend on may return
> EPROBE_DEFER and this should not be treated as "hard error".
>
>> Rather then re-trying LED registration few times, could we make sure
>> leds are always registered after triggers or something like that?
>>
> I'm afraid if guaranteeing a particular order would be possible w/o
> significant effort then the whole deferred probing concept wouldn't exist.
>
> I could imagine that we can try reordering definitions in the DTS to
> ensure a certain load order. But this might be somewhat fragile.
> So using the existing concept of deferred probing seems to me to be
> the cleaner solution.
We could go for a solution similar to v4l2-async.c mechanism which
allows for deferring video pipeline linking until all video pipeline
entities are probed, but in the LED subsystem case I think it would be
an overengineering. V4L2 media device has to wait for completion of
probing of several v4l2 drivers, whereas here we've got to wait for
a single driver. EPROBE_DEFER seems to fit for that ideally.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-26 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 20:35 [PATCH] leds: core: use deferred probing if default trigger isn't available yet Heiner Kallweit
2017-02-23 21:04 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-02-23 21:25 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-02-26 17:09 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-02-23 21:08 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-23 21:23 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-02-26 17:10 ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2017-02-26 21:00 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-26 22:07 ` Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82111085-baf8-efb9-d195-47153aa3b918@gmail.com \
--to=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox