From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
linux-leds <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032-rzn1d400-db: describe Debug LEDs
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 14:49:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250508134930.GM3865826@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBxjvofZCEi_1Fna@shikoro>
On Thu, 08 May 2025, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:39:14PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> >
> > CC leds
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 11:33, Wolfram Sang
> > <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > * using function, color, function-enumerator properties now
> > >
> > > Honestly, this is better than using node names? With V2, the LEDs were
> > > named as in the schematics, now they are called:
> > >
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 12 12:10 green:programming-0 -> ../../devices/platform/leds/leds/green:programming-0
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 12 12:10 green:programming-1 -> ../../devices/platform/leds/leds/green:programming-1
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 12 12:10 green:programming-2 -> ../../devices/platform/leds/leds/green:programming-2
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Which gets even more confusing if we might later add LEDs not on this
> > > board, but on the expansion board. 'green:programming-8' sits where?
> > >
> > > I really wonder, but if this is the official way now...
> >
> > Good point! So I'm inclined to take v2...
> >
> > Let's raise this with the LED people. I don't want to fight Pavel when
> > v2 hits the CiP tree ;-)
>
> So, if there is no other opinion here, can we remove function, color,
> function-enumerator and just use the node names which match the
> schematics? Basically apply V2?
I didn't author the semantics nor the rules surrounding them, but I am
obliged to enforce them. Therefore "LED people" say, please stick to
convention as stated in the present documentation:
https://docs.kernel.org/leds/leds-class.html#led-device-naming
Please note that a "debug" (LED_FUNCTION_DEBUG) option already exists if
that is more appropriate to your use-case.
Let's also bring Jacek into the conversion, since I know that he did a
bunch of work around this topic.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250417093256.40390-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
2025-04-17 11:39 ` [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032-rzn1d400-db: describe Debug LEDs Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-05-08 7:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-05-08 13:49 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2025-05-10 12:43 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2025-05-12 7:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-05-12 17:54 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2025-05-14 15:28 ` Lee Jones
2025-05-14 18:57 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2025-05-15 6:53 ` Lee Jones
2025-05-15 20:14 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2025-05-15 8:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-05-15 9:15 ` Lee Jones
2025-05-15 19:53 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2025-05-16 7:35 ` Alexander Dahl
2025-05-18 14:36 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2025-05-19 7:37 ` Alexander Dahl
2025-05-19 21:14 ` Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250508134930.GM3865826@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox